Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Curiosity about 9/11
Curiosity about 9/11 [message #481740] |
Fri, 07 June 2013 17:32 |
|
zeratul
Messages: 1715 Registered: January 2009 Location: Texas
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I want someone to explain to me how the twin towers falling defied the third law of motion naturally.
Third law of motion | When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to that of the first body.
|
By this logic the top should have slowed down, if not stopping completely and falling off to the side. In what way is it possible they fell from weakened steel and then plowed through layer after layer of concrete and unweakened steal as if there was nothing even there?
And i want an actual answer not some vague counter argument that doesn't answer anything, insults, or news articles. I want an exact answer as to how it could have broken the third law of motion naturally.
The world.... hell with benefits
My Website
Rules of the internetz
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Nov 21 22:59:38 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00963 seconds
|