|
|
| Why fishing at night is bad for your health. [message #103568] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 12:05   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Of all the things you could possibly run into at night, an aircraft carrier is probably the hardest to be hit by on accident.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Why fishing at night is bad for your health. [message #103570] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 12:08 |
|
|
The hardest you say? That would mean it's easier to run into a flying penis-mobile? Whoa!! I'm not sailing at night anymore!
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
| Why fishing at night is bad for your health. [message #103663] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 15:07 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Assuming they exist, yes.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Why fishing at night is bad for your health. [message #103699] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 18:11 |
|
|
|
The only way an aircraft carrier can be punctured, is if a seven-forty seven, with terrorists with bombs strapped to themselves, and micheal jackson eating ariline peanuts while ejackulating to a picture of his unborn quadruplets, ram into the side of IT!!!
|
|
|
|
| Re: Why fishing at night is bad for your health. [message #103709] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 19:02 |
 |
YSLMuffins
Messages: 1144
Registered: February 2003
Location: Moved a long time ago (it...
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Moderator - Mod Forum |
|
|
If it happens that often, what about the terrorist factor then?
-YSLMuffins
The goddess of all (bread products)
See me online as yslcheeze
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Why fishing at night is bad for your health. [message #103925] |
Sat, 24 July 2004 18:34 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I think the most likely scenario is that everyone on the fishing boat was quite drunk.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Why fishing at night is bad for your health. [message #103927] |
Sat, 24 July 2004 18:45 |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Heh, this incident reminds me of a joke 
U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln and the lighthouse
This is based on an actual radio conversation between a U.S. Navy
aircraft carrier (U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln) and Canadian authorities
off the coast of Newfoundland in October, 1995. (The radio
conversation was released by the Chief of Naval Operations on
10/10/95 authorized by the Freedom of Information Act.)
Canadians: Please divert your course 15 degrees to the South to
avoid collision.
Americans: Recommend you divert your course 15 degrees to the
North to avoid a collision.
Canadians: Negative. You will have to divert your course 15
degrees to the South to avoid a collision.
Americans: This is the Captain of a US Navy ship. I say again,
divert YOUR course.
Canadians: No, I say again, you divert YOUR course.
Americans: THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER USS LINCOLN, THE SECOND
LARGEST SHIP IN THE UNITED STATES' ATLANTIC FLEET. WE ARE
ACCOMPANIED BY THREE DESTROYERS, THREE CRUISERS AND NUMEROUS
SUPPORT VESSELS. I DEMAND THAT YOU CHANGE YOUR COURSE 15 DEGREES
NORTH--I SAY AGAIN, THAT'S ONE FIVE DEGREES NORTH--OR
COUNTER-MEASURES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THIS SHIP.
Canadians: This is a lighthouse. Your call.
source: http://www.military-quotes.com/jokes/stories.htm[/url]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
Those people on the aircraftcarrier must have been real idiots
