|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144871] |
Mon, 21 March 2005 07:56   |
 |
Jaspah
Messages: 1478
Registered: July 2003
Location: Syracuse, New York
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
ACK, you're a dumbass.
I remember you going in Aztec and killing me while you were in a area where no faces have been created by Valve. Isn't that a little odd? I mean if you were supposed to be up there... Valve obviously would of add the textures and faces to the area. :rolleyes:
I bet you that if you ask anyone who has played with me, I do not scream "CHEATER!!" every time I get shot.
I've never had so much problems with exploiters. However, you ACK, take the cake. You exploit in Aztec, Office, Prodigy (sp?), and every other map that has a tiny glitch. Valve hasn't patched it, because people are decent enough to not use those glitches... and getting in those areas isn't very common in a match outside of your beloved RenEvo Dedicated US [1] server.
[Updated on: Mon, 21 March 2005 08:22] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144883] |
Mon, 21 March 2005 09:20 |
 |
DaveGMM
Messages: 484
Registered: February 2003
Location: England, UK
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| Homey |
It's different when you affect other peoples gameplay, whether its one person or many.
|
My point in a nutshell. You go ahead, Jon, and enter all those cheats into your favourite skating game, put low gravity on, I don't care. You're not affecting my gameplay.
You put in something that allows you to blow up the PTs in a server where "innocent" people play - people who probably had never heard of the little feude you and BC had, and that I have a problem with - is this a new concept for you?
That cheating is bad?
It does undermine your position whenever you take a stance against cheating, even you have to see the light of that.
Go ad populum, yay.
And, j4S[p], Jon is any may be many things, but dumb?
That ain't one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144919] |
Mon, 21 March 2005 12:21 |
flyingfox
Messages: 1612
Registered: February 2003
Location: scotland, uk
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| DaveGMM |
You put in something that allows you to blow up the PTs in a server where "innocent" people play - people who probably had never heard of the little feude you and BC had, and that I have a problem with
|
Some tend to do stupid things to to get back at people they don't like, even reasonable people. I remember reading a while ago that if you lose your cool with someone, like a scumbag or ned, you bring yourself down to their level and stop being smart enough to ignore them and let it slip.
Though, you speak about it like cheating is the end of the world.... I mean, if I was one of those innocent players, I wouldn't be losing sleep at night because somebody turned on a cheat, blew my face off a few times or shot down my apache.
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144928] |
Mon, 21 March 2005 13:34 |
Homey
Messages: 1084
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Would it piss you off when you're playing? I know it would piss me off, half an hour later I wouldn't remember it but still. I play games for entertainment and enjoyment, not to be annoyed by something so dumb.
Homey
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #144935] |
Mon, 21 March 2005 13:59 |
 |
Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 1
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
| j4S[p |
]ACK, you're a dumbass.
I remember you going in Aztec and killing me while you were in a area where no faces have been created by Valve. Isn't that a little odd? I mean if you were supposed to be up there... Valve obviously would of add the textures and faces to the area. :rolleyes:
I bet you that if you ask anyone who has played with me, I do not scream "CHEATER!!" every time I get shot.
I've never had so much problems with exploiters. However, you ACK, take the cake. You exploit in Aztec, Office, Prodigy (sp?), and every other map that has a tiny glitch. Valve hasn't patched it, because people are decent enough to not use those glitches... and getting in those areas isn't very common in a match outside of your beloved RenEvo Dedicated US [1] server.
|
The rockslide is not an untextured area. There are no places on Aztec that I know of that allow you to reach a place where you're not standing on static world geometry that still allows you to be seen. You're making shit up now.
First you whined when I got into the rockslides. You called that an exploit, even though it's been there the entire time and it's just somehow the size of a human player so you can crouch in them. No, it doesn't hide your head you moron.
Second, you complain that I got on top of the ledge, even though it's easily accessible from the rock blocks right next to it.
Third, you complain about the trees, even though all of them are designed to be sat in considering most of the branches are physical objects.
If it were a problem and not intended, Valve would patch it. You know shit about game design. People were getting on the pipes in Train, but Valve patched that within two weeks. How does your argument hold water after that?
And yes it's common outside the server; if you actually played in different servers, you'd know that.
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #145153] |
Tue, 22 March 2005 13:32 |
|
Jaspah
Messages: 1478
Registered: July 2003
Location: Syracuse, New York
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Me making shit up? No, no, no. You're making shit up. When the fuck did I whine about the rockslides or trees, or even complain about "OMFG EXPLOTI IS COVRZ UR HED OH NOES!!11"? I told you about getting on the ledges in Aztec near the ceiling of the map. I'll show you a screenshot of what I mean in a bit, when I play Counter-Strike: Source.
Also, about your tree argument - they would by physical anway - I mean, if I a object was blown into a tree by a grenade and went threw the branches, wouldn't that be just a tiny bit odd? :rolleyes:
I do play in other servers. Other people respect the exploits, atleast us New Yorkers do. 
|
|
|
|
| Damn Counter Strike Source Hacker [message #145536] |
Thu, 24 March 2005 17:59 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| msgtpain |
I'm sorry... we're we discussing the "proper" term? or just one of the widly accepted variations of it? Does this argument seem at least a little familiar?
|
Even though this argument is long gone, you actually made a worse error than the one Aircraftkiller made.
We're = we are.
"Were" is the correct word to use in the beginning of that quote.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
.
