Renegade Alert SAM Site [message #99429] |
Sun, 04 July 2004 11:29 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba97/9ba978375d930553588e21949300738f55d8abdb" alt="" |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
...But if two negatives equal a positive, and you take both of those negatives out, then I said; "texture[s] and skin[s] have business being correlated, though."
So I didn't agree with you, unless you're using non-english...Or is there some random rule that I don't know about?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
Renegade Alert SAM Site [message #99478] |
Sun, 04 July 2004 15:43 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
mahkra
Messages: 219 Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Aircraftkiller | The last time I checked, there wasn't a requirement called "You must attain perfection before correcting others
|
Matthew 7:1-5 | 1 "Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get. 3 Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when there is the log in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye.
| ACK, all I'm saying is that you should spend a little more time proofreading your own posts if you're going to nitpick so much about anyone else's typos or misused words.
|
|
|