| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262566 is a reply to message #262552] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 02:49   |
 |
EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| gbull wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 10:22 |
| Viking wrote on Fri, 01 June 2007 23:52 |
| gbull wrote on Fri, 01 June 2007 23:49 |
C&C 3 is good :/
|
Now thats fucking bullshit right there, it is HORRABLE in all ways a game can be.
|
How so? It plays well, is being patched fairly frequently and has Joe Kucan in it. A game with Joe Kucan in it is automatically win. I also find the skirmish gameplay very replayable. Sure, there are bugs here and there but what PC game doesn't have those? Also, most of the major gaming review sites at least gave it an 80% or higher.
|
well, the fact remains that it NEEDS to be patched recently, that's the sad thing. Also, if you need to release about 4 patches in the first week after release, then I have a feeling your quality assurence fails bigtime...
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/
| V, V for Vendetta |
People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262570 is a reply to message #262544] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 03:11 |
|
|
| Viking wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 00:52 |
| gbull wrote on Fri, 01 June 2007 23:49 |
C&C 3 is good :/
|
Now thats fucking bullshit right there, it is HORRABLE in all ways a game can be.
|
the more you post, the more i dislike you.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262571 is a reply to message #261332] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 03:13 |
 |
Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
@EvilWhiteDragon
That depends on the things you're patching. Minor fixes(which the ones in the first week weren't) aren't that big of a deal to ignore, but fixes for them are still nice.
I play Guild Wars regularly and the game gets bug corrections and/or content additions at least once per week, sometimes as many as three times per week. It's nice to know that they at least take enough interest in the game to correct any errors and continue to add features even though I've already paid for the game.
[Updated on: Sat, 02 June 2007 03:13] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262618 is a reply to message #262551] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 08:51 |
 |
[NE]Fobby[GEN]
Messages: 1377
Registered: July 2004
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| MaidenTy1 wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 04:13 |
| Fobby wrote on Fri, 01 June 2007 20:40 |
TS and RA2 kicked Generals ass big time. Generals wasn't very crap, but I don't consider it a Command and Conquer game. It doesn't fall under the storyline
|
RA2 falls under the C&C storyline all of a sudden?
Just fucking lol at that. Storyline-wise it's every bit as wayward as Generals.
...
|
It doesn't follow the storyline intended by Westwood, but still follows a storyline started by Westwood. Soviets were supposed to win RA1, which led to Tiberian Dawn. However RA2 is what would happen if the Allies had actually won.
And what makes you think EA will never connect the storylines later on?
Unreal Tournament 3 Total Conversion to C&C: Renegade
Check out Renegade X Today!
Mod Wars Veteran
|
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262625 is a reply to message #262618] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 09:34 |
 |
Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
| Fobby wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 10:51 |
It doesn't follow the storyline intended by Westwood, but still follows a storyline started by Westwood. Soviets were supposed to win RA1, which led to Tiberian Dawn. However RA2 is what would happen if the Allies had actually won.
|
rofl...
RA2's "story" is banging it out to the dim-witted, overly patriotic American audience. It constantly portrays the USA as the force who bravely took the Soviets down first time around, and Europe as being whiny surrender-monkeys who can't achieve anything without American help.
Bear that in mind then go play RA1, tell me if you see a single American commander or soldier.
I'm perfectly aware of the "RA2 is what might happen if Allies won RA1" theory, but it's still laughably inconsistent with RA1. Aside from that, I don't judge games by their storyline. Just pointing out that if you someone else judges Generals by its storyline, look at fucking RA2...
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262630 is a reply to message #262625] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 10:06 |
 |
Renerage
Messages: 1223
Registered: May 2005
Location: Hamilton ON, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| MaidenTy1 wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 12:34 |
| Fobby wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 10:51 |
It doesn't follow the storyline intended by Westwood, but still follows a storyline started by Westwood. Soviets were supposed to win RA1, which led to Tiberian Dawn. However RA2 is what would happen if the Allies had actually won.
|
rofl...
RA2's "story" is banging it out to the dim-witted, overly patriotic American audience. It constantly portrays the USA as the force who bravely took the Soviets down first time around, and Europe as being whiny surrender-monkeys who can't achieve anything without American help.
Bear that in mind then go play RA1, tell me if you see a single American commander or soldier.
I'm perfectly aware of the "RA2 is what might happen if Allies won RA1" theory, but it's still laughably inconsistent with RA1. Aside from that, I don't judge games by their storyline. Just pointing out that if you someone else judges Generals by its storyline, look at fucking RA2...
|
Bad story line, decent missions and good multiplayer.
Rocketeers however, we're by far made too strong.
Time and time again, I see Mutiplayer wars won by the rocketeers.
A pissed off noob Once said:
I DESLIKE YOU!
|
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262677 is a reply to message #262625] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 14:16 |
 |
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
| MaidenTy1 wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 17:34 |
| Fobby wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 10:51 |
It doesn't follow the storyline intended by Westwood, but still follows a storyline started by Westwood. Soviets were supposed to win RA1, which led to Tiberian Dawn. However RA2 is what would happen if the Allies had actually won.
|
rofl...
RA2's "story" is banging it out to the dim-witted, overly patriotic American audience. It constantly portrays the USA as the force who bravely took the Soviets down first time around, and Europe as being whiny surrender-monkeys who can't achieve anything without American help.
Bear that in mind then go play RA1, tell me if you see a single American commander or soldier.
I'm perfectly aware of the "RA2 is what might happen if Allies won RA1" theory, but it's still laughably inconsistent with RA1. Aside from that, I don't judge games by their storyline. Just pointing out that if you someone else judges Generals by its storyline, look at fucking RA2...
|
I hear you there...
One part that really annoyed me was the 'we shouldnt need to call the europeans for help' crap...
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262696 is a reply to message #262625] |
Sat, 02 June 2007 17:09 |
 |
OWA
Messages: 647
Registered: May 2006
Location: W3D Hub
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| MaidenTy1 wrote on Sat, 02 June 2007 17:34 |
RA2's "story" is banging it out to the dim-witted, overly patriotic American audience. It constantly portrays the USA as the force who bravely took the Soviets down first time around, and Europe as being whiny surrender-monkeys who can't achieve anything without American help.
|
Didn't you listen to the installer.
| RA2 Installer |
The European Allies Rallied, eventually smashing the communist war machine.
|
No sight of OMGUSA in that sentence. Also bearing in mind that the USA get driven out of their own country by the Reds and have to look to the Europeans for help.
Generals has nothing C&C about it apart from perhaps the Overlord Tank an it's meager resembalance to the Mammoth Tank. RA2 has Tesla Coils, the Chronosphere, the Iron Curtain and the Pillbox. All of which draw parallels to RA1. Generals doesn't seem to fit anywhere. At least RA2 trys. You can't accuse it of not being a C&C Game.
The graphics on RA2 and TS were better than Generals' graphics as well. Shps and voxels just looked so much better than Generals' crappy attempt at 3d graphics.
And yes, there is a Ren2 mod in development. Check the renegade section of Moddb to find my good friend BogdanV securely at the wheel of that mod.
RA2:AR Moddb Page
Ω W A
[Updated on: Sat, 02 June 2007 17:10] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Renegade 2??? [message #262961 is a reply to message #262349] |
Sun, 03 June 2007 23:24 |
 |
reborn
Messages: 3231
Registered: September 2004
Location: uk - london
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Crimson wrote on Fri, 01 June 2007 04:17 |
EA has already said (and I've already told you) that it's not outside the realm of possibility to see them make a C&C-based FPS.
Crimson has said this many times now, she went to the LA HQ. Think about it guys, just read between the lines...
We won't know about it until there's a press release on the matter since EA is a publicly-traded company.
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
