| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109239] |
Sat, 21 August 2004 19:28  |
|
|
Do I really need to say anything else?
Republicans helping him, secretly funding his campaign trying to make what happened a few years ago happen again.
COME ON, CHOSE YOUR SIDE AND ARGUE FOR HOURS!
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109241] |
Sat, 21 August 2004 19:45  |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Nader's cut from the ballot in at least a couple states, an independent election company looked at all of Nader's signatures, and it turns out over 70% of them were false.
Looks like the Republicans forgot to cover up their tricks.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109282] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 00:38 |
NHJ BV
Messages: 712
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
70%?!? Do you have a source of that?
I did read that a lot of registered republicans gave their signature to get Nader on the ballot's though (in some regions), which is pretty sad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109320] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 07:01 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
cowmisfit, FOX News is not the truth. It is one big batch of steaming hot crap.
Foreign news is much better than American media. Pretending it isn't shows that you don't have the slightest inkling of what you are talking about.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109332] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 07:34 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Nodbugger, you don't actually ever listen to or watch foreign news, do you?
No, I was right about FOX.
And how would Canada become evil if it is invaded by Turkey?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109336] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 07:45 |
 |
Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi |
Nodbugger, you don't actually ever listen to or watch foreign news, do you?
No, I was right about FOX.
And how would Canada become evil if it is invaded by Turkey?
|
Yes, I get British, German, Vietnamese, and Japanese news stations at my house. They are all dubbed over in English.
You are wrong about FOX.
And I meant 'Lets see how evil we are when Canada gets invaded by turkey'
It is a joke. I was watching a comedy show one day and a guy was talking about Canada. I believe the joke went.
'What if Canada invaded some other country...like turkey. Look at that military strategy, lying dormant for 275 years. They show up in Turkey one day 'WERE TAKIN IT Fuckers, and we are renaming it CHICKEN!'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109389] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 10:12 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Ahhh, the blame game begins again...
Does it dawn on any of you that if Nader were "stealing" votes from Bush, it would be the Republicans bitching about him being on the ballot?
And as far as I know, there's no law that explicitly forbids a candidate from running for President when he'll be taking votes away from one major party or the other. Major elections have been decided that way- Howard Taft was voted out of office because former President Theodore Roosevelt drew too many Republican votes, allowing Democrat Woodrow Wilson to be elected.
Is Nader taking votes that otherwise would have gone to Kerry? Yes, of course he is. He's trying to get elected; naturally he's going to try to get all the votes he can. If you don't want him in office, don't fucking vote for him. It's that simple.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109392] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 10:36 |
|
|
Get freaking back on topic, NOW.
We aren't talking about Canada here, we're talking about Nader being used by the Republicans to repeat what happened a few years ago.
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109397] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 10:54 |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Ah... yes, ignorance :rolleyes:
Nowhere did anyone specify national news. All that was stated, was FOX news, no specification as to it being local or national. So, as I said, your wrong, we DO have FOX news.
Next time, if you feel like argueing, make sure you specify what your arguing about :rolleyes:
|
|
|
|
| Stop using Nader to win against the Democrats. [message #109398] |
Sun, 22 August 2004 10:56 |
|
Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| warranto |
Ah... yes, ignorance :rolleyes:
Nowhere did anyone specify national news. All that was stated, was FOX news, no specification as to it being local or national. So, as I said, your wrong, we DO have FOX news.
Next time, if you feel like argueing, make sure you specify what your arguing about :rolleyes:
|
It has FOX news on it, as in owned by FOX news, but you do not get the FOX news network. So no you were lying. You knew exactly which FOX News I was talking about. The station not the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
