  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  Crimson on Fri, 04 June 2004 14:02  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  Crimson on Fri, 04 June 2004 17:25  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  Scrumfy on Fri, 04 June 2004 20:10  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  Scrumfy on Fri, 04 June 2004 20:17  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  Scrumfy on Fri, 04 June 2004 20:23  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  Scrumfy on Fri, 04 June 2004 20:32  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  U927 on Wed, 09 June 2004 15:08  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  Crimson on Thu, 10 June 2004 12:35  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  U927 on Thu, 10 June 2004 13:27  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  U927 on Thu, 10 June 2004 18:10  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  MrBob on Thu, 10 June 2004 19:10  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:02  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:04  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:05  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:13  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:16  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:19  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:21  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:23  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:31  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  U927 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:32  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		By:  SS217 on Sun, 13 June 2004 19:49  
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 | 
	  | 
	 | 
	
		argument between xptek and BC
		
	 |