Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Dirtiest American Campaign Ever
| Dirtiest American Campaign Ever [message #93731] |
Tue, 08 June 2004 18:31   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Actually, right now the odds don't look so good for Bush. Statisticians look at records of everything trying to find any and every connection. And something that they have found is that every presidential candidate's approval rating 6 months before the election turns in to how much of the vote they draw. And it's been like this for a hundred years in American history. So come November, probability says Bush wiill draw 41% of the vote, and lose to Kerry. And then we fix Bush's mess.
I also believe Wesley Clark was cool, but Kerry has had a lot more experience in the field of politics. Someone like Dean just really wasn't ready for the spotlight yet...
| Nodbugger |
Kerry has so many problems, Bush needs multiple commercials.
|
Ok...like what? If Bush did not want to run a negative campaign he would not run a negative campaign. Your response was highly idiotic. And multiple as in 49,000?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Current Time: Tue Sep 24 14:26:56 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01213 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
