Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Why Windows?
Why Windows? [message #74759] |
Mon, 29 March 2004 23:45 |
|
K9Trooper
Messages: 821 Registered: February 2003
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
gibberish |
K9Trooper | 2000 is natively NTFS but could be installed as a FAT32 and possibly FAT16. But DOS/95 are FAT and 95OSR2/98/98SE/ME are FAT32
|
WTF are you talking about:
NTFS = New Technology Filing System
NTFS is simply a filing sytem(partion type) it has nothing to do with whether the OS is based on DOS or not.
If MS wanted to they could have released a new version of DOS that could read and write to NTFS partitions but it would still be DOS. **
The deciding factor is not the partition type, but how the OS interacts with the hardware, In Windows 3.11, windows just made DOS calls and it was DOS that made the hardware calls. In Windows NT based OS'es the windows NT kernel makes direct calls to the hardware without going through a DOS layer.
** - I think there may have been some third party software that can do this.
|
Short for NT File System, one of the file system for the Windows NT operating system (Windows NT also supports the FAT file system). NTFS has features to improve reliability, such as transaction logs to help recover from disk failures. To control access to files, you can set permissions for directories and/or individual files. NTFS files are not accessible from other operating systems such as DOS.
For large applications, NTFS supports spanning volumes, which means files and directories can be spread out across several physical disks.
R.I.P. TreyD. You will be missed, but not forgotten.
|
|
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: z310 on Sun, 28 March 2004 17:41
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: mrpirate on Sun, 28 March 2004 18:09
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: Infinint on Sun, 28 March 2004 19:41
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: rm5248 on Sun, 28 March 2004 19:58
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: Infinint on Sun, 28 March 2004 22:17
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: Weirdo on Mon, 29 March 2004 01:05
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: Scythar on Mon, 29 March 2004 06:37
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: Infinint on Mon, 29 March 2004 09:05
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: boma57 on Mon, 29 March 2004 13:38
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: NHJ BV on Mon, 29 March 2004 13:40
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: dal11 on Mon, 29 March 2004 14:09
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: tooncy on Mon, 29 March 2004 15:01
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: gam3rj on Mon, 29 March 2004 17:53
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: tooncy on Mon, 29 March 2004 19:05
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: laeubi on Tue, 30 March 2004 01:20
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: NHJ BV on Tue, 30 March 2004 01:54
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: laeubi on Tue, 30 March 2004 01:55
|
|
|
Why Windows?
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: Blazer on Tue, 30 March 2004 02:49
|
|
|
Why Windows?
By: SS217 on Tue, 30 March 2004 19:35
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Dec 03 05:23:17 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01578 seconds
|