GameSpy Title Fight - Command & Conquer Series [message #67645] |
Fri, 20 February 2004 18:15 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25a19/25a19824eb2806b41036eda9d568cf1cdb0030cf" alt="" |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987 Registered: February 2003 Location: Out to lunch
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
RA1 is the C&C RTS I play most often...followed by TD, then TS, then RA2... never, ever will I touch Generals after how craptacular the demo was.
The first C&C game I played was TD for N64...that had 3d graphics, and that didn't add anything at all to the gameplay...as soon as I got the PC-based C&C95 version, I never touched it again because of the inferior console controls.
TS did seem a bit slower in gameplay than the other games, and the music frankly sucked in comparison. However, it's still pretty fun, for a game that was as over-hyped and under-delivered as that.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|