Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised? [message #459580 is a reply to message #459563] |
Thu, 17 November 2011 21:48 |
|
Starbuzz
Messages: 2500 Registered: May 2007
Karma:
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Spoony wrote on Thu, 17 November 2011 12:06 | Quote: | Like tankclash pointed out last page, the actions of a few individuals cannot be attributed to an entire organization.
That's like saying atheists are evil because stalin and mao murdered millions.
|
No, it's not. Firstly, the Catholic Church is a specific organisation, run by specific people. One might be justified in saying "The Catholic Church is evil because it did X and Y" (and there are certainly enough evil Xs and Ys in this case) - though it wouldn't justify saying that all Catholics are evil. "Atheism" isn't a specific organisation. You could say "Stalin's regime in Russia" was evil, for example, but that has no connection to myself whatsoever; neither myself nor Stalin think the Judeo-Christian god is real, but I expect neither you nor Hitler think the Hindu gods are real; so what? What connection does this mean you and Hitler share?
|
well-worded there; it's interesting that Hitler is always left out whenever a religious person uses this argument and cites Stalin and Mao.
Atheism isn't an institution, organization, philosophy, or creed. It isn't even a way of life let alone a belief system. It is simply a description and goes along with me saying I have black eyes and black hair.
If I were use "theism" and "deism" to describe an organiztion, how asinine would I look? That's how asinine it is when "atheism" is seen as an organization/belief system.
As far as Stalin and Mao killing religious people, it has nothing to do with them not personally having a god to believe in. Both dictators targeted the religious because they were political enemies of communism. In their plans, the church had to be subdued if communism was to have had its way; hence the deaths of millions of people (which included other political enemies of communism who didn't prescribe to any religion as well).
Hitler is always left out of these debates (cos it is well-known he was religious). But who in their right mind would cite Hitler and his belief in God/his pro-Christian stance and equate that with Christians today? Wouldn't that be totally stupid? Amazingly, you see some folks cite Stalin/Mao and equate them with atheists! What a disgrace...
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Mon, 17 October 2011 03:26
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Gohax on Mon, 17 October 2011 07:14
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: shaitan on Mon, 17 October 2011 07:49
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Hypnos on Mon, 17 October 2011 08:15
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: reborn on Mon, 17 October 2011 08:43
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: ehhh on Mon, 17 October 2011 08:57
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: _SSnipe_ on Wed, 26 October 2011 23:35
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Thu, 27 October 2011 05:11
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Thu, 27 October 2011 06:07
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: reborn on Thu, 27 October 2011 06:15
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Fri, 28 October 2011 02:25
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: _SSnipe_ on Fri, 28 October 2011 20:23
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Sat, 29 October 2011 04:15
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: slosha on Wed, 02 November 2011 20:23
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Taz on Mon, 07 November 2011 04:41
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Mon, 07 November 2011 08:58
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Starbuzz on Mon, 07 November 2011 09:03
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Taz on Mon, 07 November 2011 09:48
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Mon, 07 November 2011 10:00
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Thu, 17 November 2011 12:06
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Starbuzz on Thu, 17 November 2011 21:48
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Taz on Thu, 05 January 2012 12:29
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Taz on Mon, 07 November 2011 10:30
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: reborn on Thu, 17 November 2011 23:55
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Fri, 18 November 2011 00:13
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Fri, 18 November 2011 05:41
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: Spoony on Thu, 05 January 2012 14:18
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to be shocked but not surprised?
By: liquidv2 on Mon, 09 January 2012 16:57
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Dec 02 10:06:44 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01067 seconds
|