Home » General Discussions » Spam Fest » jarhead
Re: jarhead [message #454922 is a reply to message #454907] |
Sat, 17 September 2011 12:32 |
|
Starbuzz
Messages: 2500 Registered: May 2007
Karma:
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Aircraftkiller wrote on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:06 |
/Also, regarding Azazel and his cheating, I was on my sabbatical from Renegade during that period and couldn't give less of a shit
//4.0 is out, whatever he did in the past is irrelevant. He can't cheat anymore
///Being obsessive over some nerd cheating in a game is a waste of time
////Slashies
|
Hey AK, since you were away let me fill you in. You would have to have been on the forums to understand during that episode to see why people hate his guts now and bring it up over and over everytime he posts. It is nothing about him cheating but the way he acts (even now) as if it didn't happen and most importantly his refusal to apologize.
People don't have problems with him cheating or him being a cheater but of his absolutely dishonest attitude of pretending it didn't even happen. Here's a summary:
Azazel was on a massive crusade to burn those who he thought was cheating (while being a mod at NS). At the height of his hypocritical cheating, he created this thread demanding the forum ban of 0x90. In it, he argued persistently for the ban of cheaters not just in-game but also on respective gaming forums. By his campaign of lies, he successfully created an image of "angelic purity" around himself.
Then each and every one of us got the big bang shocker when Tiesto announced on July 17, 2010 how exactly Azazel was giving Ted Haggard stiff hard competition for the "Mr. Hypocrite of the Universe" award while he was on his crusade against cheaters. Everyone blasted him left and right and after getting over my initial shock and disappointment, was the first one to suggest we all forgive him after he does the decent thing and offers an apology.
Now here's the part that is totally relevant to why people keep bringing this up: Azazel disappeared! His last post before his fleeing was on July 16, 2010 (a day before we all heard from Tiesto of his cheating). But before that he gave us two more insightful lessons into his character in two seperate incidents:
He downright lied with the lamest excuse to his cheating instead of admitting it.
And a few days later in another incident tried to evade the ban and offered yet another pathetic excuse.
You have got to read these as we did as it happened to see the exact nature of such a abhorrent trainwreck of the standards of conduct he holds himself to. Tells a lot about him and yet I still did think one short apology would wipe all that away like I still do.
And that was the end of Azazel for one whole year. The guy who was on a anti-cheater crusade that regularly signed in and posted each day and was on the forums 24/7 vanished once everyone heard of his hypocrisy. It was a humiliating exit.
After nearly a year he returns on July 1 this year (no doubt he was reading up on the forums all along) to refute rumours that he had returned. And since then had used that thread to regain a foothold back on the forums to restart posting while we have yet to hear an apology. And since then had been posting around, chasing opportunities with supporting/allying himself with those he feels he need to rebuild his Renecredibility with most recently sticking up to Crimson and Jarhead (the same people he was backstabbing being a cheating mod in the first place). A child can understand the psychological game he is playing and the vast majority of Reneplayers who are honest by nature here at RF are offended by this behaviour of this frauding entity. It has nothing to do with triggerbot, patch 4.0, or like you said "being obsessive over some nerd cheating in a game" but the repugnant nature of his character that pisses the average honest person off each time he posts.
So it is not surprising in the least when people bring up something "old" whenever he posts because those things will remain new as long as he pretends it never happened like he is doing now. He says he is mature now but we have yet to hear an apology. That will go a long way to restore credibility. People aren't stupid; simply popping back in after a long self-inflicted exit, starting to post, sticking up for those he let down in the past and slowly trying to get back Renecredits and work on that unban request (which is sure to follow) seems downright criminal. So it's not surprising when people shit on him whenever he posts. A lot of folks will agree with all this.
|
|
|
|
|
jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Tue, 13 September 2011 09:05
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Tue, 13 September 2011 09:48
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 13 September 2011 12:59
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Tue, 13 September 2011 13:34
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:02
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Thu, 15 September 2011 08:58
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Thu, 15 September 2011 13:07
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: kadoosh on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:13
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: TankClash on Wed, 14 September 2011 15:08
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:20
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Gohax on Tue, 13 September 2011 20:56
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 13 September 2011 18:46
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Wed, 14 September 2011 01:55
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Gohax on Thu, 15 September 2011 08:07
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Wed, 14 September 2011 13:27
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: grant89uk on Thu, 15 September 2011 10:35
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: slosha on Thu, 15 September 2011 11:30
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Thu, 15 September 2011 15:35
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Fri, 16 September 2011 01:12
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:28
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Fri, 16 September 2011 08:17
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Fri, 16 September 2011 07:51
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Fri, 16 September 2011 11:25
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 16 September 2011 12:36
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Fri, 16 September 2011 13:26
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Fri, 16 September 2011 18:41
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Fri, 16 September 2011 08:53
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ehhh on Fri, 16 September 2011 09:06
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Fri, 16 September 2011 11:38
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Fri, 16 September 2011 22:12
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:01
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Thu, 15 September 2011 18:29
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Fri, 16 September 2011 09:59
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Fri, 16 September 2011 15:57
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 00:56
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Sat, 17 September 2011 09:27
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:01
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:51
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:59
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 12:31
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:10
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Starbuzz on Sat, 17 September 2011 12:32
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Sat, 17 September 2011 14:00
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Sat, 17 September 2011 17:52
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Sat, 17 September 2011 14:30
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 16:41
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:04
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Jan 30 14:00:50 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01193 seconds
|