Home » General Discussions » Spam Fest » jarhead
Re: jarhead [message #454857 is a reply to message #454757] |
Fri, 16 September 2011 22:12 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407 Registered: February 2007
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | Therefore, you haven't had a first hand experiance with him, thus you can't make an accurate judgement.
|
i trust many of the people i've heard from about him
i don't trust you, and the fact that crimson does says a lot about her as a person
Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | He wouldn't want to moderate/admin anywhere else for one reason alone, loyalty.
|
that one reason is no one else would put up with his shit
Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | He certainly knows how to do his job properly and he'd be a great asset to any community.
|
i don't understand how you created this sentence with a throat full of dick
Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | I'm certainly not arsekissing, because that's something I wont do. I'm simply speaking my mind, everyone's allowed to have their own opinion after all.
|
in my opinion you're a hypocritical piece of shit, and the fact that you of all people are the only one standing up for him doesn't help his case
if anything it hurts it
Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | Mudkips: Maybe if you didn't act like a troll so much, he wouldn't have been so hostile towards you? (If he was, anyways).
|
maybe if jarhead wasn't a shitty admin people wouldn't have so many issues with him
Azazel wrote on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:12 | For players/users that haven't actually had a problem with Jarhead here's my advice to you: Don't believe everything you read about him, because most of it probably isn't even true. So unless you have actually had a "first hand experiance" with him, then it's pointless in saying "I've heard this" and "People have said that". Go experiance what he's really like for yourselves and I bet you'll be suprised.
|
for players/users that take anything you say seriously there isn't much hope
your word isn't any more credible than MUDKIPS's word based on your own statement
Jarhead is a heaping pile of shit, and you're the lone fly circling it
anyone reading this topic can identify that immediately
|
|
|
|
|
jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Tue, 13 September 2011 09:05
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Tue, 13 September 2011 09:48
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 13 September 2011 12:59
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Tue, 13 September 2011 13:34
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:02
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Thu, 15 September 2011 08:58
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Thu, 15 September 2011 13:07
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: kadoosh on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:13
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: TankClash on Wed, 14 September 2011 15:08
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Tue, 13 September 2011 15:20
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Gohax on Tue, 13 September 2011 20:56
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 13 September 2011 18:46
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Wed, 14 September 2011 01:55
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Gohax on Thu, 15 September 2011 08:07
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Wed, 14 September 2011 13:27
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: grant89uk on Thu, 15 September 2011 10:35
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: slosha on Thu, 15 September 2011 11:30
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Thu, 15 September 2011 15:35
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Fri, 16 September 2011 01:12
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 16 September 2011 03:28
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Spoony on Fri, 16 September 2011 08:17
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Fri, 16 September 2011 07:51
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Fri, 16 September 2011 11:25
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 16 September 2011 12:36
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Fri, 16 September 2011 13:26
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: R315r4z0r on Fri, 16 September 2011 18:41
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Fri, 16 September 2011 08:53
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ehhh on Fri, 16 September 2011 09:06
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Fri, 16 September 2011 11:38
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Fri, 16 September 2011 22:12
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:01
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Thu, 15 September 2011 18:29
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Fri, 16 September 2011 09:59
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Fri, 16 September 2011 15:57
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 00:56
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Sat, 17 September 2011 09:27
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:01
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:51
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Sean on Sat, 17 September 2011 10:59
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 12:31
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Crimson on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:10
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Starbuzz on Sat, 17 September 2011 12:32
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: Prulez on Sat, 17 September 2011 14:00
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: liquidv2 on Sat, 17 September 2011 17:52
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Sat, 17 September 2011 14:30
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: MUDKIPS on Sat, 17 September 2011 16:41
|
|
|
Re: jarhead
By: ChewML on Sat, 17 September 2011 18:04
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Jan 30 13:47:23 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01675 seconds
|