Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » What should C&C3 have been?
Re: What should C&C3 have been? [message #420602 is a reply to message #420583] |
Mon, 22 February 2010 19:00 |
|
terminator 101
Messages: 822 Registered: March 2003 Location: Toronto
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Mon, 22 February 2010 18:48 |
Personally, I LOVED how the Scrin were in TD (a small, tiny spacecraft), Renegade (an outright crashed UFO being investigated by Nod), and in TS (a remade ship, as well as being more or less hinted at than directly mentioned and appearing). They should have continued along a similar path, possibly with the end being something along the lines of Nod and/or GDI discovering that there are more scout ships patrolling around Earth's atmosphere or something (which would hint at a very imminent invasion).
I really did hate how the Scrin just outright invaded in C&C3, but I still like the idea of them.
|
They were in TD? What mission was that in? I played that game many times but never noticed any such space ship, or a reference to it.(Then again, I have never seen any cutscenes for the GDI because the cracked dos version that I had did not have those)
Unless you mean this:
Though that barely looks like anything like an ufo.
"It is time you saw the future, while you still have human eyes"
Cheaters only Cheat themselves!
so
Hasta la vista, baby!
[Updated on: Mon, 22 February 2010 19:07] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: zeratul on Mon, 22 February 2010 16:46
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 06:24
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 17:32
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nope.avi on Mon, 22 February 2010 18:35
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:55
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: DRNG on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:04
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:18
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: DRNG on Tue, 23 February 2010 05:53
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Zion on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:12
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:32
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: HaTe on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:35
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: cmatt42 on Wed, 24 February 2010 22:31
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Tiesto on Wed, 24 February 2010 07:02
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 12:12
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Nov 28 01:24:56 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01121 seconds
|