Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » The problem with CarrierII
Re: The problem with CarrierII [message #416167 is a reply to message #416161] |
Wed, 30 December 2009 10:38 |
|
Herr Surth
Messages: 1684 Registered: July 2007
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
CarrierII wrote on Wed, 30 December 2009 11:46 | rofl. For those of you interested in the story...
Map was Walls_Flying, I was GDI, and Surth was Nod. Due to a silly spat of tit-for-tat building kills, both sides were reduced to a Rax/HON and a Ref, then GDI's Rax got nuked with sniper cover. We still got pretty close to a disarm though.
In the confusion of all the building kills, there was a lot of tank thefts, and when play settled down, GDI had a stolen stank.
I, half jokingly, suggested I could get into Nod's base with the stank and ion something. (The last attempt, involving another player as a hotwire in the stank to C4 the ref failed because I put timed on a sak's butt, which naturally caused her to respawn in the ref and the stank had to run)
I got in, past a player walking in circles for no obvious reason and drove all the way behind the destroyed strip and PP and parked the stank by the ref silo. I got out, and placed the ion.
Surth's post pretty much has the rest, although I did shoot the only engi not blind enough to not notice the ion right behind the ref silo.
ROFL.
|
AND IT WAS MARATHON. ther horrible boringness
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: ChewML on Mon, 28 December 2009 21:36
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: RMCool13 on Mon, 28 December 2009 22:21
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: Altzan on Tue, 29 December 2009 00:41
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: Goztow on Tue, 29 December 2009 01:06
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: ChewML on Tue, 29 December 2009 01:30
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: ErroR on Tue, 29 December 2009 05:22
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: ErroR on Thu, 31 December 2009 16:25
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: IAmFenix on Sun, 03 January 2010 07:57
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: Kimb on Mon, 04 January 2010 00:56
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: Dover on Mon, 04 January 2010 01:15
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: nopol10 on Wed, 30 December 2009 16:39
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: ChewML on Wed, 30 December 2009 10:53
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: HaTe on Wed, 30 December 2009 12:18
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: ChewML on Wed, 30 December 2009 12:35
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
By: HaTe on Wed, 30 December 2009 12:38
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
|
|
Re: The problem with CarrierII
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 17 19:00:33 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01279 seconds
|