Re: Viable terms for "seeding"? [message #399075 is a reply to message #398913] |
Sat, 22 August 2009 22:13 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ff25/2ff257d8b49c70094978af0d6aabab10ab66de3f" alt="" |
RadioactiveHell
Messages: 175 Registered: August 2009 Location: San Antonio, TX
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
Goztow wrote on Sat, 22 August 2009 02:35 | Just ask Spoony, tbh...
|
^
But to elaborate, I agree that the current seeding system is essentially just what community has the most members. I dont think it really matters tho in the end, whatever the best team is should still win either way.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7148/f71487e04ebeba8490dc5534bba76225021dd9a7" alt="http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/2740/radioactivehellsignatur.gif"
[Updated on: Sat, 22 August 2009 22:15] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|