Re: Would anyone find a hardcore mode fun? [message #397901 is a reply to message #397873] |
Fri, 14 August 2009 03:42 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3e26/a3e26e4d1f3f825c2d65f01a6b06da702a27849a" alt="" |
Dover
Messages: 2547 Registered: March 2006 Location: Monterey, California
Karma:
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
All the arguements thus far amount to "The team deserving to lose would lose hard", which I see as a good thing, not a bad thing. If you have one building left and it's being camped by tanks and snipers, then you lost. There's no reason why you should feel entitled to a chance at victory at that point.
Although I agree that this mode probably isn't a good idea, nor do I see anything particularly "hardcore" about it.
DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 | Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|