Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Xptek
| Xptek [message #364255] |
Sun, 21 December 2008 09:11  |
 |
Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
I'm going to make a request of you, and I'd prefer it if everyone else kept the thread relatively spam-free (unless they have something worth adding) until xptek has answered.
Consider releasing Linkup.
You said that in your opinion, the community isn't worth any effort and expense on your part. Regardless of what I think about that opinion, I can't change it for you. I can only point out that you're talking about a minority of people here, and what really matters is the players themselves. If you despised everyone who currently posts on this forum with a passion, they would probably still add up to a minority of the people who actually play the game.
Anyway, you wouldn't have to pay for it. Give it to Crimson or whoever, let TT take it from there. You could carry on being involved if you wanted, or you could just dump it in TT's lap and run, up to you.
Let me give you an example of the benefits. Null and havocide kept saying that a clan ladder through Linkup would be so much better than Clanwars.cc. I would be the first to agree that in principle, auto > manual. But that's not all there is to it. If it was, how do we explain Clanwars.cc being more successful than the "official" WOL clan ladder? See, that's why I laughed at null and havocide; it hadn't occurred to them that just because a ladder is auto, it still isn't going to do very well if it's run by someone who knows nothing about how to actually manage a clan ladder.
With all modesty aside, I think I do, more than anybody. I certainly have more experience and a better track record. So imagine how good the ladder could be if it was auto AND it was run by someone who actually knows what they're doing. It would be the best clan ladder the game has ever had. This game had an auto ladder in the past, but it was absolutely crap because it wasn't moderated and the people in charge of it didn't care. (Null and Havocide, of course, would know this if they knew a damn thing about clanning in this game) That's why people used mine; it might be manual report, but it was run much better. So imagine an auto ladder run by me, eh?
That's just one great thing that could come out of it. You probably know the other benefits better than I do.
So please consider this. Not for me, not for Crimson, not for TT, not even for you (even though you'd earn an untold amount of respect from the community, and you'd certainly be "the better man")... do it for the game. Do something really good for Renegade. Think practically; what have you got to lose?
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
[Updated on: Sun, 21 December 2008 09:17] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
 |
|
Xptek
By: Spoony on Sun, 21 December 2008 09:11 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Sun, 21 December 2008 09:54 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Spoony on Sun, 21 December 2008 11:04 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: reborn on Sun, 21 December 2008 11:03 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Hitman on Sun, 21 December 2008 11:31 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Spoony on Sun, 21 December 2008 13:46 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Ma1kel on Sun, 21 December 2008 17:01 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: spigot on Mon, 22 December 2008 12:52 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Spoony on Mon, 22 December 2008 15:24 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: spigot on Mon, 22 December 2008 15:33 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Hitman on Wed, 21 January 2009 11:19 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: reborn on Thu, 22 January 2009 03:45 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Thu, 22 January 2009 08:21 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: reborn on Thu, 22 January 2009 10:35 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Thu, 22 January 2009 11:52 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: reborn on Thu, 22 January 2009 12:01 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Thu, 22 January 2009 12:48 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Crimson on Thu, 22 January 2009 14:54 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Ethenal on Thu, 22 January 2009 22:02 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: dr3w2 on Thu, 22 January 2009 23:00 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: luv2pb on Fri, 23 January 2009 22:55 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Fri, 23 January 2009 00:44 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Fri, 23 January 2009 06:51 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: reborn on Fri, 23 January 2009 12:04 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Memphis on Fri, 23 January 2009 13:51 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Crimson on Sat, 24 January 2009 09:47 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Sat, 24 January 2009 10:48 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Crimson on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Ethenal on Sat, 24 January 2009 15:17 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Aprime on Sat, 24 January 2009 23:43 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Ma1kel on Sun, 25 January 2009 10:13 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: u6795 on Sun, 25 January 2009 10:20 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: luv2pb on Sun, 25 January 2009 14:18 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Goztow on Sun, 25 January 2009 14:33 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: luv2pb on Mon, 26 January 2009 12:00 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Crimson on Thu, 29 January 2009 02:28 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: Crimson on Mon, 26 January 2009 06:34 |
|
|
Re: Xptek
|
|
|
Re: Xptek
By: reborn on Thu, 29 January 2009 03:23 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 10 10:39:08 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02042 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
