Re: What do you hate about Windows Vista/What can be improved/added on Windows Vista to make it bett [message #332913 is a reply to message #332876] |
Sun, 01 June 2008 09:15 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19a74/19a7439a9b486663a0ae0cc8ed3e2b02ac323d49" alt="" |
Dave Anderson
Messages: 1953 Registered: December 2004 Location: United States
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Blazer wrote on Sun, 01 June 2008 01:08 |
{SB}Lone0001 wrote on Fri, 30 May 2008 19:07 |
The fact you require 1GB to even use it and 2GB to use it without it slowing down your computer
|
Thats funny because I had Vista installed on a machine here that only has 512MB of RAM, and it ran perfectly fine, including playing C&C3 and Call of Duty 4 with ease.
|
I can confirm that. I used Vista with 768mb of memory for awhile and it also ran perfectly fine. Sure I was bottlenecked by a 478 socket so games didn't run hardly, but the Vista experience itself was just fine.
I have found that Vista is hardly different from XP, and as a matter of fact I have found that I like the features in Vista quite a bit more.
Vista is also much better than XP when it comes to system diagnostics, self repair, and troubleshooting thanks to the awesome diag. team at MSFT! (Thanks guys!). Vista should be more stable than XP actually.
David Anderson
Founder, Software Consultant
DCOM Productions
Microsoft Partner (MSP)
|
|
|