Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » US bashing (I strike back)
() 4 Votes
Re: US bashing (I strike back) [message #310940 is a reply to message #310922] |
Mon, 14 January 2008 18:11 |
|
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836 Registered: March 2005 Location: New York
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
Dover wrote on Mon, 14 January 2008 19:13 |
R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 14 January 2008 12:00 | However, when a known non-ally starts massing WMD out side of our country, of course we are going to act.
Why the hell would they start massing missiles THAT far away from home and THAT close to American soil? I mean, without any intention for using them. Or at least using them to threaten the country.
|
So, it's okay for the US to deliver miltary equipment to Afghanistan "THAT far away from home" to help out "Allies" but the Soviets can't deliver military equipment to Cuba (One of THEIR allies)? American hypocricy speaks again.
|
What the hell are you talking about?! I didn't think it was that possible to be that thick headed!
What purpose would Cuba have with WMDs in such an isolated area with absolutely nothing near then except for the US which they aren't allied with.
There is a large difference in delivering weapons to Afghanistan and building WMDs in Cuba.
-There is a war going and supplies are kind of needed. There was no reason for Cuba to have WMDs because there wasn't any reason for them to go to war, as far as I know.
-Delivering weapons to continue a war is different than creating nukes just for fun. For one reason one of the above doesn't destroy everything in a 2 mile radius.
The only reason for me to understand why you don't understand (did that make sense?) is if you where to live in Eurasia, which I thought you lived in southern California...
But just in case you didn't get my point before, I will try to explain it again.
Countries in Europe and Asia all live neighboring each other. If they wanted to start a war with each other, then what is the point of porting the WMDs across the Pacific ocean right next to one single country? The only reason is if they wanted to launch the missiles onto the US, that is the only reason I can think of, short of simply hiding missiles for later use on other countries, which even in that case, it was good for them to be dismantled.
Lets say the Soviets wanted to build nukes to attack lets just say for the sake of argument, China. Why would they port missiles across the Pacific and hide them in Cuba, to which the US is well within the firing range of, only to be later transported back?
It is completely different that dropping a bomb from a plane that took off from the West Cost. First of all, moving missiles into Cuba is like preparing to fire them onto the US. The US having a bomber that can take off from the West coast and travel to Moscow isn't preparing for an attack, it is waiting to be attacked.
One is simply offense, and the other one is defense. There is absolutely no reason why the US would pick a nuclear war with some other county for no reason. And that is the reason why we can't trust anyone else with a nuke.
Haven't you heard the expression if you can't have something done right, you have to do it yourself? Well, it applies here. We know we can trust ourselves to not offensively fire a nuke without warning on another nation, but how can we be so sure that some other nation feels the same way? Call it paranoia if you will.
[Updated on: Mon, 14 January 2008 18:17] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Ethenal on Fri, 11 January 2008 20:45
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: BlueThen on Fri, 11 January 2008 20:47
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Jecht on Fri, 11 January 2008 22:22
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Ethenal on Fri, 11 January 2008 23:35
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Fri, 11 January 2008 23:39
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Jecht on Sat, 12 January 2008 07:52
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Sat, 12 January 2008 09:21
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Mon, 14 January 2008 01:06
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Mon, 14 January 2008 15:50
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Mon, 14 January 2008 17:13
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Mon, 14 January 2008 19:30
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Mon, 14 January 2008 22:59
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 15 January 2008 12:57
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 15 January 2008 14:11
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 14:03
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 14:36
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 15:37
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 19:18
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 19:49
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:11
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: BlueThen on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:13
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: BlueThen on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:23
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: BlueThen on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:26
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:30
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:27
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Fri, 18 January 2008 03:06
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: cnc95fan on Sat, 12 January 2008 03:52
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: cnc95fan on Sat, 12 January 2008 12:10
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Ethenal on Sat, 12 January 2008 12:42
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: z310 on Sun, 13 January 2008 21:47
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 16:52
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:29
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:32
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:35
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 20:39
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 21:19
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 15 January 2008 21:42
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 21:44
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Tue, 15 January 2008 22:02
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Blazer on Tue, 15 January 2008 23:15
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 15 January 2008 23:30
|
|
|
Re: US bashing (I strike back)
By: Dover on Wed, 16 January 2008 00:46
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Jan 22 11:13:41 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01597 seconds
|