Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » film shortener
Re: film shortener [message #278291 is a reply to message #278268] |
Fri, 10 August 2007 12:19 |
|
Ryu
Messages: 2833 Registered: September 2006 Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma:
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
BlueThen wrote on Fri, 10 August 2007 12:46 |
Quackpunk wrote on Fri, 10 August 2007 10:24 | thank you. after a little searching i found the timeline tool that edits fragments of movies in windows movie maker
|
Hah! I win!
|
No, Windows Movie Maker blows when it comes to real life films, The quality will blow ass.
Quack, You have 2 options, Use Vegas video and render at 720p (HDTV Quality)
Or leave the adds in and use XviD to encode it and keep quality.
Whatever you do, Don't use WMM.
Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: BlueThen on Thu, 09 August 2007 12:31
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: luv2pb on Thu, 09 August 2007 19:37
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: BlueThen on Thu, 09 August 2007 19:43
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: Zion on Thu, 09 August 2007 16:41
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: BlueThen on Thu, 09 August 2007 16:55
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: Zion on Fri, 10 August 2007 02:39
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: Caveman on Fri, 10 August 2007 08:19
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: Ryu on Thu, 09 August 2007 18:21
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: jnz on Thu, 09 August 2007 19:45
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: BlueThen on Fri, 10 August 2007 10:46
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: Ryu on Fri, 10 August 2007 12:19
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: BlueThen on Fri, 10 August 2007 12:21
|
|
|
Re: film shortener
By: Jonty on Mon, 13 August 2007 01:27
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Dec 04 20:59:58 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01821 seconds
|