Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore" [message #253838 is a reply to message #253819] |
Fri, 13 April 2007 06:08 |
|
NukeIt15
Messages: 987 Registered: February 2003 Location: Out to lunch
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
Alternately, if you can't get vehicles out the gate for one reason or another (say you have no good engi support)- Under and Field are good examples, since the base entrances are choke points which can easily be bottled up by the enemy- you can buy a bunch of anti-vehicle infantry and go to town on them. Three or four anti-vehicle troops can really do a number on a siege/blockade, and they're much harder to hit than another tank would be (forgetting for a moment that they also gain loads more points for killing tanks than enemy snipers do for killing them).
No, tanks aren't that hard to kill, artiller/MRLS even less so. If you can't kill armor, you're either being outplayed or under-supported.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Spoony on Fri, 13 April 2007 04:14
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Goztow on Fri, 13 April 2007 04:25
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Crimson on Fri, 13 April 2007 05:06
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Tunaman on Fri, 13 April 2007 05:24
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Spoony on Fri, 13 April 2007 05:28
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Goztow on Fri, 13 April 2007 06:12
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Spoony on Fri, 13 April 2007 06:15
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: BlueThen on Fri, 13 April 2007 11:41
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: NukeIt15 on Fri, 13 April 2007 06:08
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Spoony on Fri, 13 April 2007 06:29
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: jnz on Fri, 13 April 2007 06:39
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: OWA on Fri, 13 April 2007 09:15
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Tunaman on Fri, 13 April 2007 09:32
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: Spoony on Sat, 14 April 2007 09:59
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: JohnDoe on Sat, 14 April 2007 06:31
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
By: hsq91 on Sat, 14 April 2007 11:21
|
|
|
Re: An opinion piece - "Pointwhore"
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 11 20:14:32 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01260 seconds
|