Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » What's worse? losing barracks or wf?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #25247]

Mon, 16 June 2003 14:11

maytridy
Messages: 1371
Registered: February 2003
Location: New York, USA

Karma:

General (1 Star)

Depends.......

Map with base defences: WF is more important.

No base defences: Barracks is more important.

Visit www.mwbhd.com

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 13:51
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 14:12
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 14:56
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 18:24
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 21:04
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 21:29
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 22:27
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Mon, 24 February 2003 17:08
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Tue, 25 February 2003 02:57
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Tue, 25 February 2003 08:37
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Wed, 26 February 2003 00:42
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Thu, 27 February 2003 04:29
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: xpontius on Thu, 01 May 2003 09:26
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Majiin Vegeta on Thu, 01 May 2003 09:45
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: coolmant on Thu, 01 May 2003 15:26
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: dArKz3rO on Thu, 01 May 2003 15:39
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: DukeLeto on Thu, 01 May 2003 17:12
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: coolmant on Fri, 02 May 2003 07:50
		WF is of course far more worse By: jsival on Sun, 04 May 2003 03:34
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Commando no. 448 on Sun, 04 May 2003 07:43
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Bassoonboy on Sun, 04 May 2003 08:21
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: xpontius on Mon, 05 May 2003 09:41
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: HTDana on Mon, 05 May 2003 09:45
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: [sg]the0ne on Tue, 06 May 2003 22:16
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Afromn96 on Tue, 13 May 2003 20:12
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: -Tech- on Tue, 13 May 2003 22:19
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Argon Vex on Sun, 18 May 2003 03:31
		Re: What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nightma13 on Sun, 25 May 2003 09:39
		Souper By: Azndemon989 on Mon, 16 June 2003 12:50
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: maytridy on Mon, 16 June 2003 14:11
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: General Havoc on Mon, 16 June 2003 16:43
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Tue, 17 June 2003 07:50
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nuttavud1 on Mon, 30 June 2003 07:21
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: yahoo on Thu, 17 July 2003 13:39
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Fri, 18 July 2003 03:58
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nuttavud1 on Sat, 19 July 2003 08:28
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Sun, 20 July 2003 07:10
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nuttavud1 on Wed, 23 July 2003 05:42
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Wed, 23 July 2003 06:19
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Jaspah on Wed, 23 July 2003 10:08
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: B.N.C on Mon, 28 July 2003 05:30

Previous Topic:	strategy, give yours
Next Topic:	Would A kangaroo with a pistol be funny? yes/no

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Feb 16 10:47:31 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01735 seconds