Re: gunner & laser chaingunner - vehicle kill stats [message #242886 is a reply to message #95867] |
Fri, 02 February 2007 06:40 |
|
Sniper_De7
Messages: 866 Registered: April 2004 Location: Wisconsin
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
no, the gunner is better, there is no debate. If you're close enough with a gunner as you would need to be with a laser chain gunner, then you shouldn't miss, and as seen the lcg is only marginally better, and only the respects of over time, which is generally useless because you're not going to live against a full health tank unless the tank was really bad. or unless you're far enough away from the tank that you can shoot them without them firing back at you which is why gunners can even be better than pics in some regards. Say in field when you lost the warfactory, it's better that you attack flame tank rushes or stank rushes before they reach your base so that at least by the time they get to teh AGT they don't have 7 flame tanks all ready to attack. Now if you had LCGs you would have to wait till they come up right up to you. Not only are gunners better against tanks though, but they're good against infantry if you know hwo to use them. Good deal for 400 credits i think
Oderint, dum metuant.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. - Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt
[Updated on: Fri, 02 February 2007 06:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|