| Re: For Warranto [message #238647 is a reply to message #238634] |
Thu, 11 January 2007 16:04   |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma:
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Fine, I'll address the concerns directly.
| Quote: |
There were no rules being broken
|
There do not have to be broken rules to lock a thread. A thread being locked simply means the moderators do not want it to continue.
| Quote: |
I was asking a question about a valid concern.
|
Pointless concern, you mean. Your initial post that I locked was for the sole purpose of starting another argument.
"You can't just keep closing their threads because they don't agree with you."
Not a valid reason for opening a new thread. It would have only continued the argument that was being ended in the previous 3 or 4 threads that were locked. Hence, I locked that thread as well. The issue was to be DROPPED, as in suddenly come to a stop, do not pass Go, do not collect $200.00.
| Quote: |
It also did not continue to stir up further arguments related to the other threads. So why was THAT one locked?
|
Ah, but it did, because if I had started in on the ideas presented, the connection would have been made as the history of the other threads would have to be used.
ie. The threads were not locked because Crimson thought she was losing (other pipe in to counter that) Nor is she doing it to hide the truth (others return to refute that)... argument continues.
And, I'm sure you can guess what will happen to this thread. Right, locked.
I do not care what you have to say in response to this. Any further threads about it will simply be locked. This time I will not be courteous enough to leave a response first.
Edit: As Crimson has stated, I'm locking the threads because there was the appearance given for this whole Spoony-Crimson stuff and related matters to cease. If she wishes to allow this to continue, then she can unlock and future thread about this subject matter (this thread included) and I will cease to lock subsequent threads.
Why do I try to act on her behalf in matters such as this?
'Cause she's the boss.
[Updated on: Thu, 11 January 2007 16:09] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
