Home » Archived Forums » RenGuard Client » Test
Re: *cheat name removed* Test [message #236652 is a reply to message #236650] |
Mon, 01 January 2007 07:12 |
0x90
Messages: 142 Registered: September 2006 Location: Germany
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
songokuk wrote on Mon, 01 January 2007 14:36 | fair point.
why cant they update rg so it checks application titles?
one simple update server side (ie a list of banned application titles) and rg would recognise the new title, i suppose he would update it to randomise the title but surely that would slow em down or at least annoy them.
|
mhh no.. i would rather block the check for application titles just like the check for cheat files and so on. that would make the whole check useless and can approx. be done very quick.
plus you have to think about that the *cheat name removed* loader (so the main gui application) doesnt have to run. so i could just load renguard, inject the hook and immediately close the main gui.
and for the screenshot of renguard thing: yes i think there will be an option to hide the *cheat name removed* output in renguard in the next version. or at least to remove it on demand for a screenshot or something since its a nice to have debug output (to see if its actually working and stuff).
so its indeed really hard to catch someone. the "cheaters" are somehow always one step in front. like blazer said once: everything is "crackable" and its often easier to bypass something or not getting caught than prevent cheating or catching someone.
regards
0x90
[Updated on: Wed, 03 January 2007 10:36] by Moderator Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Test
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 27 December 2006 14:29
|
|
|
Re: *cheat name removed* Test
By: light on Wed, 27 December 2006 14:49
|
|
|
Re: *cheat name removed* Test
By: 0x90 on Wed, 27 December 2006 16:30
|
|
|
Re: *cheat name removed* Test
By: Ryu on Thu, 28 December 2006 02:36
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: 0x90 on Thu, 28 December 2006 05:04
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: Spoony on Thu, 28 December 2006 22:48
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 27 December 2006 18:27
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: fl00d3d on Thu, 28 December 2006 00:48
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: fl00d3d on Thu, 28 December 2006 11:37
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: light on Thu, 28 December 2006 12:47
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: Cat998 on Tue, 02 January 2007 02:33
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: Renx on Thu, 28 December 2006 23:40
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: songokuk on Sun, 31 December 2006 12:51
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
|
|
|
Re: *cheat name removed* Test
By: Renx on Mon, 01 January 2007 06:06
|
|
|
Re: *cheat name removed* Test
By: songokuk on Mon, 01 January 2007 06:36
|
|
|
Re: *cheat name removed* Test
By: 0x90 on Mon, 01 January 2007 07:12
|
|
|
Re: *cheat name removed* Test
By: Blazer on Tue, 02 January 2007 02:23
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: Spoony on Tue, 02 January 2007 07:02
|
|
|
Re: rgh Test
By: Goztow on Mon, 01 January 2007 14:31
|
|
|
Re: Test
By: fl00d3d on Thu, 04 January 2007 23:54
|
|
|
Re: Test
By: Goztow on Fri, 05 January 2007 00:35
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 29 18:01:55 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01217 seconds
|