Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » infantry Vs vehicles
Re: infantry Vs vehicles [message #228823 is a reply to message #228804] |
Tue, 31 October 2006 05:07 |
|
Sniper_De7
Messages: 866 Registered: April 2004 Location: Wisconsin
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
help-linux wrote on Tue, 31 October 2006 02:23 | put a sydney (ion) again a arty. see who wins.
it is all about skill. if the sydney just stood there (shooting) the arty would win.
|
If there were no vehicle limit, than vehicles should always win against infantry. 10 APC's > 10 Infantry of other team's choice. However, in a case like a 20 player game or more, 7 APCs would probably still be better than 10 infantry, because vehicles are that much more powerful. But if you're going to talk about a server that has 40 people it's a little hard for a team of vehicles to do as much as it could since they're fighting against more infantry, 7 APCs most likely wouldn't match 20 Infantry (if they all decided to be PICs) It's rare to find a server where you'd have that many people even smart enough to get PICs, it's also rare that people would have the money in the first place to afford it. It's also common that there are at least 2 hotwires defending. But yeah, tanks are best in conjunction with a tech/hotwire inside of them, however, they're still very effective without a tech or hotwire.
As for the 1v1 situation, You couldn't possibly just state a scenario like that and have a real answer. For one, it depends on the map. It depends on where you are on the map. It depends on how accurate the guy in the arty can shoot, it depends on how smart he is, and knows when to take cover and where a safe place is to be behind a wall and just repair to full while if the pic even decided to get closer he'd get creamed. It also depends partly on if the PIC is able to at least dodge, granted, that any idiot knows this, as any idiot is able to hit a vehicle with a gun that reaches its target instantly and the target is so big compared to infantry.
Besides the point, who said the artillery would be the choice of vehicle against infantry? How, pray tell, would a PIC be able to kill an APC that can easily outrun it and just repair behidn cover, even if the guy in the APC sucked so much he couldn't kill a lone PIC?
It's just completely *stupid* to say you saw a case in some stupid public server where they lost the warfactory/strip and decided to camp with infantry and still win. For one thing, as said, in a 40 player server you can have way more infantry than vehicles. But oh no, if you have snipers with your vehicles, even though you only have 7 vehicles to 20 infantry, it somehow is unfair? If you had 7 vehicles and 13 infantry on one team, you seem to think this is somehow unfair? Well, why? Say 13 snipers killed 13 snipers on the other team, that leads you with 7 infantry vs 7 vehicles. But oh no, why would THAT count, right? Another thing is that it's a PUBLIC FUCKING SERVER - Meaning, The skill level is so varied, that just because some nuke went off, or some rush worked on the other team because some of the good players were in the tunnels fucking around sniping, doens't mean they were the best team in the first place, because maybe the people fucking around in the tunnels decided to actually try after they lost the war factory/strip and decided to defend? Also, the individual skill is also quite low in publics because 99% of the people in vehicles aren't able to bodyshot infantry, or how to aim properly in an APC.
Truth is, in a case of a large server, and you kill the other team's warfactory/strip, the best thing to do would be to camp because you should have the most points, and that is usually the case, and even if it wasn't the case, it'd be, 99% of the time, that the other team would have more points because they bought vehicles too .
But whatever, if you still don't see the point, I might cry to jesus asking him why are people stupid
Oderint, dum metuant.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. - Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt
[Updated on: Tue, 31 October 2006 05:07] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
infantry Vs vehicles
By: futura83 on Sat, 19 August 2006 15:59
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: mrpirate on Sat, 19 August 2006 16:29
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Ryu on Sat, 07 October 2006 08:35
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: jnz on Sat, 19 August 2006 17:15
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Sat, 19 August 2006 17:32
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Dover on Sun, 20 August 2006 02:58
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Sun, 20 August 2006 08:58
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Dover on Mon, 21 August 2006 06:33
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Tue, 22 August 2006 16:37
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Goztow on Mon, 21 August 2006 06:58
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Dover on Mon, 21 August 2006 07:19
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Deathgod on Sat, 07 October 2006 04:44
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Tzar469 on Thu, 12 October 2006 19:02
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Renerage on Thu, 12 October 2006 21:25
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: DaN#GW on Sat, 14 October 2006 15:59
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Goztow on Thu, 12 October 2006 23:47
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Sat, 14 October 2006 07:44
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: mrpirate on Sat, 14 October 2006 08:11
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: mrpirate on Sat, 14 October 2006 16:30
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Dover on Thu, 19 October 2006 00:35
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Thu, 19 October 2006 06:02
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Deathgod on Sat, 21 October 2006 05:53
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Goztow on Thu, 19 October 2006 04:18
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Dover on Thu, 19 October 2006 20:44
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Fri, 20 October 2006 05:26
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Goztow on Fri, 20 October 2006 00:01
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: jnz on Fri, 20 October 2006 09:24
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Fri, 20 October 2006 09:40
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: futura83 on Fri, 20 October 2006 10:27
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Sat, 21 October 2006 06:36
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: jnz on Fri, 20 October 2006 10:42
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Goztow on Fri, 20 October 2006 23:29
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Deathgod on Sat, 21 October 2006 05:54
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Dover on Mon, 30 October 2006 00:42
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Mon, 30 October 2006 11:20
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Renerage on Mon, 30 October 2006 11:47
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Deathgod on Sat, 04 November 2006 12:21
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: jnz on Tue, 31 October 2006 01:23
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Goztow on Tue, 31 October 2006 01:28
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Spoony on Tue, 31 October 2006 02:02
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
|
|
|
Re: infantry Vs vehicles
By: Goztow on Tue, 31 October 2006 05:51
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Nov 27 20:57:04 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01944 seconds
|