Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Dispute between WG and Tsunami
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami [message #228178 is a reply to message #228121] |
Wed, 25 October 2006 14:04 |
fl00d3d
Messages: 1107 Registered: August 2003 Location: Iowa, USA
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
j_ball430 wrote on Wed, 25 October 2006 16:14 | If fl00d3d didn't hold up his end of the agreement with you, then he voids your contract. In doing so, you have no agreement to keep letting Kamuix use the box, allowing you to take it from him, thus voiding his and TA's contract. If both of those incidents took place, then you having the nick is neither morally or legally wrong, in my eyes.
|
Justin doesnt have the power to void our contract with Kamuix. He only has the power to cause problems between Tsunami and Kamuix ... which he has done. As long as Tsunami provides Kamuix the box he was promised, our end has been filled. We had no chance or warning to make things right with Kamuix. Which we are in the process of doing right now.
jschultz9 wrote on Wed, 25 October 2006 16:16 | fl00d3d failed to make his payment on the box, I kept the box online, made the payment, kam was able to keep his servers and everything online. Without having to switch everything to a new box.
Kam agreed to this, as it was in his best intrest since fl00d3d didnt make his payment to me for the box.
I could have shut down the box, and left everyone sitting high and dry, but I didnt, I made things easier for Kam and good for me. Sorry fl00d3d, but I dont fork out cash of 200 a month to get screwed over. You dont pay me, ill let box go offline, Kam looses his stuff, you loose nick. I get Kam a new box, i get nick.
All has the same end result. Just without all the extra leg work.
|
(1) It was never part of the agreement that I would pay you for this box. It was only agreed that Kamuix would get *A* box. Which he did. And now that you're tkaing that from him he will get *A*nother box.
(2) You kept Kam running because you had him by the balls and you wanted to keep his favor. I would do the same thing if I were him ... just to keep my shit up until I found out what was really going on. As I write this Kamuix was thrown off your server because he chose to do the right thing. Youre response? Kicked him off ... rather than let him back up his things and leave peacefully. How generous.
(3) How could your claims possibly be true if I am going to "fork over" just as much money for that box you were running .. to Kamuix ... right now? We are paying just as much money for his box right now as you were paying for yours. The only difference is, now we're smart enough to realize that bringing 3rd parties into agreements was a dumb thing to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 25 October 2006 10:11
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 25 October 2006 11:28
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 25 October 2006 11:40
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
By: Tunaman on Wed, 25 October 2006 11:42
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
|
|
|
Re: To all the clans
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 25 October 2006 11:48
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: Dave on Wed, 25 October 2006 11:56
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: Crimson on Wed, 25 October 2006 12:17
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 25 October 2006 13:54
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 12:40
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: Crimson on Wed, 25 October 2006 12:43
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 12:52
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: Crimson on Wed, 25 October 2006 12:55
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 13:07
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: Dave on Wed, 25 October 2006 13:12
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 13:25
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 13:36
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 13:43
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 13:55
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 25 October 2006 14:04
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: warranto on Wed, 25 October 2006 14:21
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: Crimson on Wed, 25 October 2006 14:24
|
|
|
Re: Dispute between WG and Tsunami
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 25 October 2006 14:57
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 22 06:21:08 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01484 seconds
|