Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » The Three, Which one are you?
Re: The Three, Which one are you? [message #212549 is a reply to message #212492] Wed, 09 August 2006 19:53 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Darker is currently offline  Darker
Messages: 42
Registered: August 2006
Location: Canada, Ont
Karma:
Recruit
I was not as serious about what i started in my earlier posts.

Quote:

Just look at this. He was saying you reminded him of Moe? Is this bad? Why is it bad? What is he doing here that suggested he was making you look stupid?



I never said he was trying to make me look stupid.

Quote:

Also, why is it the ways of the "asswiser" to not admit what you are "closest" too?


by "the way of" is like a symptom, doesn't really mean anything yet.

Quote:

You do not have any sort of qualifications to be putting traits into a system.


They are not Traits being put into a system, only Opinions and Terms that I came up with Smile, No one is to say what a "Good" system would be.

Quote:

So anyways, if you say someone is doing something that an asswiser would do, which is bad, you are putting them down. You don't have to specifically call them an asswiser to do it, you know. Thus, you are being, in a way, an asswiser yourself (by your definition) This however wouldn't mean I am being it. Since, all I am doing is pointing out to you is that by your own definition you are doing the exact same thing you think is bad. Just a statement and nothing more.


I never said an an Asswiser was a bad thing, just because it has ass in it, does not mean anything. So there for, i would not be putting anyone down.

Quote:

So if you would RATHER put up a classification for people who generally do good things or bad things, that's up to you, but this system of yours does neither. And I'm sure if you did do just the classification system for good-bad, that no one is ever pure good or pure bad, especially when there are different interpretations for each case. Would it be completely *bad* if a person wasn't willing to give up his life to save anothers? or even two other lives? Not everyone is capable of giving up their lives for such a cause. From an objective point of view, it would naturally be better that two people survived than one, so does this mean if a person was to be good, he would be willing to give up his life for two others? and if he wasn't that that would be bad?



I never said one was Good or bad, its just 2 typed of people that think differently, do different things, i guess in my opinion one is good and the other is bad, but thats just opinion. If you think an my definition of an Asswiser is a "Good person" Thats just opinion Lol.

Sorry if i made it out to be a classification system. Smile


 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Laptop Advice
Next Topic: does anyone play online anymore?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Dec 04 13:23:37 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01477 seconds