Home » Renegade Discussions » Mod Forum » W3D Engine Test
W3D Engine Test [message #19338] |
Thu, 08 May 2003 00:34 |
PiMuRho
Messages: 494 Registered: February 2003
Karma:
|
Commander |
|
|
Ack is correct. Raw polygons themselves are pretty meaningless - your video card will slow down when there's a whole load of textures waiting to be drawn to the screen - it's memory bandwidth we're talking about here. What's even worse than that is multi-pass textures, where any polys have to be redrawn for each material pass.
It doesn't matter what method you use for texturing - UVW maps are basically just projections. Each texture you have stored in the frame buffer (video memory) slows you down when it's drawn. The bigger the texture, the slower it draws (keep them under 512x512)
Ack is also right about the non-map polycounts - you have to bear in mind that your 30,000 polygon map is going to be filled with people and tanks, with a combined polycount that almost equals that of your map (and could even exceed it on larger servers)
Another reason you want to avoid high-poly maps in Renegade is the VIS system. It's not very good. In an engine like UT2003, you can have two rooms each with 20,000 polys, and the engine will only draw one. In Renegade, it's quite possible that it'll draw both...
This whole thing is moot anyway - you're not testing the engine's ability at all, but that of people's systems. W3D has no hard-coded polygon limit. If you want to make a high-detail map, get clever. Brute force is the worst way to do it. There's a whole load of little techniques you can use to make areas look more detailed than they actually are.
Dev Diary
|
|
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Mon, 05 May 2003 18:30
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Mon, 05 May 2003 19:30
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Dante on Mon, 05 May 2003 21:05
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Mon, 05 May 2003 21:44
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Mon, 05 May 2003 23:31
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: PiMuRho on Tue, 06 May 2003 03:09
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: PiMuRho on Tue, 06 May 2003 03:58
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Halo38 on Tue, 06 May 2003 09:44
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Wed, 07 May 2003 15:54
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Wed, 07 May 2003 17:26
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Wed, 07 May 2003 17:44
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Wed, 07 May 2003 17:46
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Wed, 07 May 2003 17:53
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Wed, 07 May 2003 17:53
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Wed, 07 May 2003 17:58
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Wed, 07 May 2003 18:08
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Wed, 07 May 2003 18:11
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Wed, 07 May 2003 18:13
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Wed, 07 May 2003 18:23
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Madtone on Wed, 07 May 2003 19:09
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: PiMuRho on Thu, 08 May 2003 00:34
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: PiMuRho on Thu, 08 May 2003 02:45
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Javaxcx on Thu, 08 May 2003 04:13
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Thu, 08 May 2003 09:12
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
By: Carl on Thu, 08 May 2003 09:16
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
|
|
W3D Engine Test
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Dec 11 12:47:21 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01094 seconds
|