| Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » Vehicles vs Infantry 
	| 
		
			| Re: Vehicles vs Infantry [message #190147 is a reply to message #190142] | Wed, 15 February 2006 23:26   |  
			| 
				
				|  |  Renerage Messages: 1223
 Registered: May 2005
 Location: Hamilton ON, Canada
 
	Karma: 
 | General (1 Star) |  |  |  
	| | Terminator 101 wrote on Thu, 16 February 2006 00:59 |  | I am sorry people, but I don't find Chem Warrior very useful, unless you are fighting in small tunnels, or if you want to play with harvester like cat with mouse.
 Chem warrior is sort of step up from flame trooper, because it much better in every way, and the only advantages that flame trooper has is that it is free and can survive a bit more hits from explosive weapons, but this advantage is not that useful anyway.
 It is almost like rocket officer and gunner on GDI. There really is no reason to get Rocket Officer, because gunner is much better. But there is one difference here, while flame trooper has at least some advantages, GDI rocket officer has none.
 
 Anyway, I think that at least the free infantry should have infinite ammo, to make it more useful.
 
 | 
 
 Infinite ammo with infantry would make it unbalanced. Think about it. Raveshaw with infinite ammo. Thats insane that they never have to reload, they could minch any tank. Blah, not worth it.
 
 
 
  
 A pissed off noob Once said:
 I DESLIKE YOU!
 |  
	|  |  | 
	Goto Forum:
	|  |  | Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: mrpirate  on Tue, 14 February 2006 19:09 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Renerage  on Tue, 14 February 2006 21:13 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: ghost  on Tue, 14 February 2006 18:41 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: mrpirate  on Tue, 14 February 2006 21:54 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Renerage  on Tue, 14 February 2006 21:59 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: mrpirate  on Tue, 14 February 2006 22:48 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Spoony  on Wed, 15 February 2006 00:49 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Goztow  on Wed, 15 February 2006 02:02 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: mrpirate  on Wed, 15 February 2006 08:20 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Renerage  on Wed, 15 February 2006 20:17 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: mrpirate  on Wed, 15 February 2006 21:36 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Renerage  on Wed, 15 February 2006 23:26 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Renerage  on Thu, 16 February 2006 18:53 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Renerage  on Thu, 16 February 2006 09:32 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: mrpirate  on Thu, 16 February 2006 11:31 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Spoony  on Thu, 16 February 2006 12:46 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: mrpirate  on Thu, 16 February 2006 19:34 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: RTsa  on Fri, 17 February 2006 13:58 |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry |  
	|  |  | Re: Vehicles vs Infantry By: Dover  on Sat, 25 March 2006 19:53 |  
 
 Current Time: Fri Oct 31 09:42:52 MST 2025 
 Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01464 seconds |