Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » A path beyond site move
| Re: RA:APB Site Move [message #183998 is a reply to message #183925] |
Wed, 28 December 2005 20:41   |
Chronojam
Messages: 688
Registered: March 2003
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
Would you like his contact information so you can verify this? I wouldn't mind providing it, it's available at moddb anyways if you don't want to wait for me to give it to you.
What Aircraftkiller did may have been "unethical, insensitive, and illegal" although proving any of that is going to be difficult; he didn't steal a kid or rip off copyrighted source code or lie about what things were or how far Reborn had progressed, come on. However, I'd say the site's my business, and the team's.
Aircraftkiller does what Aircraftkiller wants to do. I'm not going to control his actions or get involved in his personal life where I'm not interested in involving myself, and he does not involve any members of the team in situations where they do not want to be involved.
A few things on the PCNC news post: The team itself never recieved any contact from PCNC, and I only saw the message they sent to Aircraftkiller myself last night; there's no chance in hell Aircraftkiller would just suddenly play nice with Reborn, there's been too much back-and-forth over the *years* for that; I removed the supposedly-leaked content as soon as I was contacted as the site's manager and as a team representative (it wasn't an involuntary act done shadily by a GSI tech in the middle of the night or anything) and then I talked to Renardin about it to determine the truth about the content of the files the claimed were leaked; Aircraftkiller actually tried to find out if the team would be punished for *his* actions just-in-case but was under the impression that as long as nothing was hosted by us, the team, on GSI and as long as we, the team, didn't post about it all over a GSI page, that the team shouldn't have to suffer any consequences: because, after all, Aircraftkiller doesn't want get the team in trouble because of his own actions, and was trying to be somewhat responsible about his "exp0sing" of Reborn's lies about having 73% of all content done / ingame / whatever.
Just a quick question: unless he actually showed everybody this version of Reborn alleged to be a month old, would you have believed him when he told you that Reborn really wasn't really over 70% complete? No, you'd just dismiss it as his usual ranting and cite lack of evidence probably; or am I wrong about that?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
A path beyond site move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Aidoneus on Wed, 28 December 2005 12:31 |
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Renx on Wed, 28 December 2005 22:51 |
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: U927 on Wed, 28 December 2005 12:38 |
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Grass on Wed, 28 December 2005 15:53 |
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Aprime on Thu, 29 December 2005 00:24 |
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Goztow on Thu, 29 December 2005 03:06 |
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: Crimson on Sat, 31 December 2005 03:24 |
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: Crimson on Sat, 31 December 2005 19:42 |
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: Aprime on Sat, 31 December 2005 15:36 |
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: warranto on Sun, 01 January 2006 20:25 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Dec 11 02:20:47 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00939 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
