Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: General Discussion » BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion

Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion (

) 4 Votes

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion [message #171313 is a reply to message #171297]

Mon, 12 September 2005 14:49

luv2pb
Messages: 1488
Registered: February 2004

Karma:

General (1 Star)
Not everything is as it appears
Untouchable

Spoony wrote on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:20

luv2pb wrote on Mon, 12 September 2005 13:20

They aren't

You can't absolutely rule that, crimson herself has said renguard isn't 100% un-bypassable. Close to 100%, sure, but if it isn't 100% then your statement is flawed.

weather or not I know that RG is not 100% un-bypassable (past, present or future) I take the stance that it is perfect. I believe that poeple like us (being admins and mods) do not need to be going around encouraging the brainless twats that can't form their own thoughts that RG is flawed in any way. All they do then is run around and say RG doesn't work because spoony said it wasn't 100%. When in fact you were asked to back that statement up and you could not. And for the record it is also the claim of Crimson and BHS that every flaw in the past has been fixed (and quick) and is currently 100%. Does that explain why I say that?

Back to the subject BHS rocks

N00bstories Director Of Operations

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Blazer on Sat, 10 September 2005 01:57
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: Xtrm2Matt on Sat, 10 September 2005 02:25
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: YSLMuffins on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:00
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: Xtrm2Matt on Sun, 11 September 2005 02:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 02:53
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Ma1kel on Sat, 10 September 2005 05:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: greb on Sat, 10 September 2005 10:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 12:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Nightma12 on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Sat, 10 September 2005 11:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: xptek on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:58
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Parad0x on Sat, 10 September 2005 16:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Nightma12 on Sat, 10 September 2005 15:02
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 20:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 20:59
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:05
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:11
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:13
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:15
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:17
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:19
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:21
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: DarkDemin on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Aircraftkiller on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:42
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: DarkDemin on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:48
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:01
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: grnfusion on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: grnfusion on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:47
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Sun, 11 September 2005 07:33
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: NukeIt15 on Sun, 11 September 2005 10:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 11:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: msgtpain on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:05
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:08
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:11
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:23
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Dave Mason on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:25
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:36
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Sun, 11 September 2005 14:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Sun, 11 September 2005 14:50
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Mon, 12 September 2005 11:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sun, 11 September 2005 17:06
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Sun, 11 September 2005 17:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Blazer on Sun, 11 September 2005 19:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Mon, 12 September 2005 05:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Weirdo on Sun, 11 September 2005 23:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: light on Mon, 12 September 2005 03:19
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Belski on Mon, 12 September 2005 04:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Mon, 12 September 2005 10:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Spoony_old on Mon, 12 September 2005 13:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Mon, 12 September 2005 14:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Spoony_old on Tue, 13 September 2005 00:36
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Mon, 12 September 2005 13:18
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: spreegem on Mon, 12 September 2005 14:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:04
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:07
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:13
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:23
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Dave Mason on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:09
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:10
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:25
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:29
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Renx on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:29
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:43
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:45
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:47
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:53
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:59
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:08
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:32
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:39
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:06
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:10
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:16
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Chronojam on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:42
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:43
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 01:48
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 03:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Belski on Tue, 13 September 2005 04:30
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 12:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: dead6re on Tue, 13 September 2005 12:58
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 06:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Tue, 13 September 2005 07:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 13:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Aircraftkiller on Tue, 13 September 2005 13:56
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Tue, 13 September 2005 14:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 17:32

Previous Topic:	ATTENTION
Next Topic:	best hoting ever

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Nov 28 02:35:32 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01982 seconds