San Franscisco considers firearm ban [message #132358] |
Sat, 15 January 2005 21:52 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/687b5/687b534de25b5421226be997f9129523285a5c86" alt="" |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989 Registered: September 2003 Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I'm more worried about the automatic (semi?) ban that expired. I'd rather be confronted with a hand gun than an Uzi.
But I'd support this thing SF is doing. A ban on handguns in a major city makes perfect sense.
I think they should ban guns altogether.
The constitution allowed guns when it was first written, but that was a good 200 years ago. AFAIK, there are no invaders, no British Soldiers, indians or any wild cattle atacking me. I don't think there is a need for that sort of "defense" anymore. Guns get into the hands of criminals too often.
Guns should only be in the hands of Policemen, and Military personnelle.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99831/99831c1c8054a393bf26f5b9bd672bc3e4151620" alt="http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg"
Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
[Updated on: Mon, 17 January 2005 17:34] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|