Election in Afghanistan may be a failure, UN gets blamed :( [message #119288] |
Sat, 09 October 2004 15:38 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba97/9ba978375d930553588e21949300738f55d8abdb" alt="" |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
The situation is so friggin complicated in Afghanistan right now...There's a book about it I should read, but I haven't yet. Mainly because it's one of those books by really smart people, and is quite boring.
Thus, I won't be getting into this.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|