Bush would NOT have been drafted into Vietnam [message #116715] |
Sun, 26 September 2004 15:38 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba97/9ba978375d930553588e21949300738f55d8abdb" alt="" |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Crimson | If the Republican party or the Bush campaign was bringing this up, maybe... but it's just Nodbugger and he doesn't speak on anyone's behalf but his own.
|
Ah, yes, the odd grammatical error that I missed. But still, Noddo, if all you can come up with is that Bush wouldn't have been drafted, it means nothing. He joined the guard before the lottery was even around, playing it safe so that he wouldn't have to go to Vietnam, because we all know that Americans need to protect the rich ones.
Nodbugger | protesters that I see places, they have little sayings on their signs, but none of them are true.
|
COUGHPROTESTWARRIORCOUGH
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|