Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies » Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks [message #-980764]

Wed, 20 February 2002 13:43

Anonymous

I kind of agree, they are kind of useless... but however, for the people out there who cant aim (me).
Black Hand and Patch are good for taking out infantry, as they can usually kill a guy in just a couple shots at a fast rate(could someone tell me how many shots to the torso it takes to kill a soldier with a minigun?)... PLUS, they each get more health, which is always a plus on the battlefield.

These units are not meant to take out tanks, so dont try it. In command and conquer, do you ever send out a minigunner, or chem warrior to take out some tanks? Not usually... Tanks are meant to take out tanks.

And by the way, 50 bucks more or less... 175 less... who cares? not like a big waste of money for someone who takes out infantry more quickly and efficiently.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 13:20
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 13:43
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 13:58
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 15:19
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 16:31
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 21:44
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 21:54
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Wed, 20 February 2002 22:41
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Thu, 21 February 2002 00:32
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Thu, 21 February 2002 00:38
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Thu, 21 February 2002 00:53
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Thu, 21 February 2002 01:01
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Thu, 21 February 2002 01:03
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Thu, 21 March 2002 20:24
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Thu, 21 March 2002 23:42
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Fri, 22 March 2002 01:00
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Fri, 22 March 2002 06:29
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Fri, 22 March 2002 08:30
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Fri, 22 March 2002 10:54
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Fri, 22 March 2002 11:42
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Sat, 23 March 2002 01:22
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Sat, 23 March 2002 02:15
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Sat, 23 March 2002 10:07
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Sat, 23 March 2002 10:19
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Sat, 23 March 2002 20:41
		Patch/Black hand Chain-laser = more firepower vs tanks By: Anonymous on Sun, 24 March 2002 11:42

Previous Topic:	How the hell do you sneak past the guard tower through tunne
Next Topic:	The ultimate tactic

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Jan 19 11:46:26 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00979 seconds