Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies » The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps [message #-979316]

Thu, 07 March 2002 04:15

Anonymous

well i love the flame tank too, but it is hardly and "unbeatable" weapon. it's teamwork, not weapons that win. last night i played a game where the nod seemed to be winning early, but the longer the game lasted, the more gdi was winning the field with those mammoths, mrls's and medium tanks. it finally got to the point the nod could do nothing offensive and everybody was stuck defending the base and the gdi won by points when the time limit expired. it was a great game and a lot of fun for both sides..

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 00:01
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 00:08
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 00:11
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 00:37
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 01:08
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 01:17
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 02:04
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 04:02
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 04:15
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 06:20
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 06:55
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 07:17
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 07:23
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 08:22
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 08:25
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 08:53
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 08:59
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 10:39
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Thu, 07 March 2002 21:58
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 March 2002 06:16
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 March 2002 06:20
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 March 2002 07:53
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 March 2002 10:16
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 March 2002 11:37
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 March 2002 11:45
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Fri, 08 March 2002 12:11
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Sun, 10 March 2002 23:09
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Mon, 11 March 2002 00:21
		The **** flame tank is to strong on no base defences maps By: Anonymous on Mon, 11 March 2002 04:25

Previous Topic:	Cheap trick
Next Topic:	Mammoths and Weapons

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Feb 07 05:50:58 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01041 seconds