Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » How could a Construction Yard work on newer maps? (also an
How could a Construction Yard work on newer maps? (also an [message #-975586] Mon, 08 April 2002 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Anonymous
Personally I think the airstrike beacon is a doable idea and in junction with an armor rush could somewhat even the odds for GDI.

The nQ (n00b Quotient) idea isn't really implementable but **** would it be nice.

The Temple/CommCenter buildings would be incredible, but you'd invariably have people complaining about not having beacons when the other side does - though it's 5x harder for GDI to deploy a beacon than NOD.

The "Spy" character is a bad idea. Someone is already reporting "cross-team" characters (whether it's a cheat or bug is still up for debate), but the stink it caused is reason enough not to do it - besides - RA introduced the spy, not Renegade.

The IR goggles are definitely doable. Not by modders, but definitely by WW. Hell, the SP game has a PersBatSu with a scanner (in a cutscene - where mysteriously they just don't KILL Havoc - a la Austin Powers "I'm going to put them in an easily escapable position and hope everything goes according to plan...") that can detect stealth - so it wouldn't be TOO off the original story.

NEW IDEAS:

Some splash damage for the nuke. Not much, but hey, if you're gonna call something a "20 megaton hydrogen bomb," it shouldn't just take out one building. Either rename the thing to a tactical nuke, or make it lethal to any infantry in a set blast radius (not just the cloud) like it was in the game. A temporary radioactive zone wouldn't be too much to ask, either - and definitely doable - just code the area as a barren tiberium field with a rate of decay.

Personalized lines for different characters. I dunno about you, but a Hotwire/Sydney/Sakura saying in Havoc's voice "Keep 'em coming" is somewhat unsettling.

10 second reduction off a GDI beacon destruction time and 5 seconds off the deploy time. Face it, a geosynchronous satellite has a lesser "get up and go" time than a ballistic missile. Add the fact that it's very hard for GDI to be covert, and you make the sides a tad more even.

Server-settable limited superweapon beacons. Nothing is more annoying than a team doing nothing but laying beacons. If there were a minimum of five beacons for each side in the game (server settable), it would force SMARTER players to be much more sparing with them. And if you're on a team with a bunch of inbred idiots who waste them, well, you're screwed. That's life. If you ask me, you should only be able to buy a beacon if you're in the top 25\% of the players on the server - only elite players should be authorized to handle such destructive firepower.

Losing credits for FF kills. I don't know about everyone else, but if there's a PKer on my team, I don't want him wielding something which can give one-shot kills.

DEFINITELY a server-settable number of mines (max of 50-60), especially for servers with over 24 people.

That's all I can think of for now.

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Taking out the Obelisk first
Next Topic: Expandable Bases
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 30 19:55:45 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01004 seconds