Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » GDI whoops butt.
GDI whoops butt. [message #-964813] Sun, 10 November 2002 01:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Anonymous
quote:
Originally posted by aimforyourhead:
Alright admit it GDI is way better than Nod. Orcas dominate Apaches. Havoc reaks on Sakura. And PIC Sydney reigns Ion Cannon crap on Raveshaw every day of the week and your wondering why I'm putting this under Tactics & Strategies because a good tactic AND strategy is be GDI. If anyone thinks Nod is better post your reason why here and I'll tell you why GDI dominates over your crappy thought that Nod rules.

Your only excuse for writing this is you have a brain tumor. How the **** do you reason that an orca is better than an apache, PIC is better than Raveshaw, and Havoc is better than Sakura. Apache and orca are equals, your ****ty logic is probably you think the orca looks cooler, so its better. Havoc and Sakura are equals, there is no reasoning otherwise. A PIC IS more powerful than a railgun, but the railgun reloads faster, and the PIC often has a second delay before it fires.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Places 4 Beacons?
Next Topic: 2v2 challange
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Feb 17 04:49:38 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01290 seconds