Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
| Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?) [message #78542] |
Sat, 10 April 2004 18:14   |
abakshi
Messages: 50
Registered: June 2003
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Javaxcx |
The theory of time and light is a bit comfusing:
If at the speed of light, time stops, then shouldn't there theoretically be light at every point of the universe all at once? I'm aware of the decelleration of light, but that still doesn't account for alot of empty space.
|
Time does not stop at the speed of light.
The way "time travel" is viewed by Einstein's relativity is that if you - being an object with mass (not a photon of light) - will experience time (the space-time continuum, if you will) slower than on earth. It is relative, so for example while a period of time may seem to you like an hour, years may have passed on Earth, depending on how fast you are travelling. So then if you go back, it may have been an hour for you and a hundred years on Earth, so you have "travelled to the future." And since it has only been an hour for you, your body is only an hour older.
However, you do not need to go at the speed of light to experience the effects of time dilation. It even occurs at slower speeds - the effects are so small that we humans do not notice it. However, there was an experiment done a while ago with two jet planes travelling toward each other, both with atomic clocks onboard. The clocks' time readings were confirmed to be exactly the same before takeoff. When the planes landed, there was a time difference of about 0.0002 seconds IIRC. That means nothing to a person, but it is very noticable to an atomic clck.
So this explains how you can go to the future.
Now there is a way you can theoretically go to the past as well - my AP Physics teacher spent a few hours explaining the details of how, but I don't recall, and I don't think an incorrect explanation would help this thread too much  , so I'll leave that up to you to find online .
The reason why we don't seem to have people from the future, from a theoretical standpoint, is that if you go back in time, you create your own timeline - your own universe - that is different from our "normal" one. So then because we live in the normal one, we don't see people from alternate ones.
But then this brings up the point of predestination...think about this - having a "normal" and an alternate timeline implies that you were not "supposed" to leave the normal timeline but you have. But then if everything you have done normally is part of the "normal" timeline, why is travelling to the past anything different. Let's say you just travelled back in time - if you were "supposed" to have taken the train this morning, for example, because you did so, weren't you "supposed" to have travelled back in time as you just did?...so then it does really come down to the idea of predestination - were you "supposed" to have done what you are doing. If not then how did something get screwed up? After this, the argument becomes quite strange and most people would zone out (if you're still reading my post.... ).
Anyway, the idea of time travel intrigues most people, and though a theoretical physicist would probably explain it all much better than I can, I think it's an interesting idea. If you read up on it, it becomes really scary - for example, if you go back in time to a time when you were alive, "you" from that time are still there, but now "you" from "now" are there. So there are two of "you." Let's say you do something and accidently kill an ancestor of yours - if you go back to the future, you are not going to your future - you are creating a new future (a new branch of the space-time continuum), and you would not exist in this future...
That reminded me - the movie Back to the Future (I, II, and III) from the 80's was quite interesting as brings a lot of these things into perspective (although the flux capacitor and the 83 mph speed may be just a tad off ).
Anyway, if you're still reading that's cool  I doubt very many people did so though - as the average attention span is like .02 seconds
Maybe this clarified some things or confused you more than you wanted to be....
WOL: mbakshi, Radeon980
http://www.techautos.com
P4 2.8C (800 FSB) / ASUS P4P800 Deluxe / 512MB PC3200 DDR / 80GB Maxtor 7200RPM 8MB / ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB / Lite-On 16x DVD-ROM / Win XP Pro / Dell 1800FP 18" LCD / Enermax Case
P4 2.2 / ASUS P4T533-C / 512MB PC1066 RDRAM / 120GB WD 7200RPM / 45GB IBM 7200RPM / ATI AIW Radeon 8500DV 64MB / Cendyne (Pioneer) DVD-RW / Sony CD-RW / Win XP Pro / Nokia 800Pro+ 18" LCD / Aluminum Case
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: rm5248 on Sat, 10 April 2004 06:11 |
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: Scythar on Sat, 10 April 2004 06:16 |
|
|
Re: Movies and Real Life
By: MrBob on Sat, 10 April 2004 06:34 |
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: Try_lee on Sat, 10 April 2004 16:34 |
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: z310 on Sat, 10 April 2004 16:40 |
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: Javaxcx on Sat, 10 April 2004 16:48 |
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: Javaxcx on Sat, 10 April 2004 16:58 |
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
|
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: abakshi on Sat, 10 April 2004 18:14 |
|
|
Movies, Real Life, and Time Travel (Why not?)
By: prox on Sat, 10 April 2004 19:40 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 18 22:23:11 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00813 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
