|
|
|
|
|
|
| Who would you ban? [message #77467] |
Thu, 08 April 2004 21:29   |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I'm alright with letting them both stay, but when you can't stop sounding like you are on a period, you should be more cautious.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Who would you ban? [message #77633] |
Fri, 09 April 2004 11:28 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Alkaline...for making a general ass of himself without giving any reason for it. ACK may be crabby, but at least he's honest about it.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Who would you ban? [message #77772] |
Fri, 09 April 2004 14:20 |
flyingfox
Messages: 1612
Registered: February 2003
Location: scotland, uk
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
|
Is this another one of those "he's supposed to read the poll votes, take the hint and leave himself" threads like the one about fl00ded? Because I seem to recall people eventually not giving a fuck about fl00ded and getting used to him. So what he's jumped into threads with "your mod suxxors", so have a lot of newbies. Were those newbs banned? No, because crimson and blazer are unbiased admins that'll only ban people if they actually break rules. Why ban on public opinion? Is that a mark of a good admin?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
51 / 39%
