|
|
|
Beware the Ides of March [message #71787] |
Mon, 15 March 2004 13:44 |
|
England
Messages: 618 Registered: February 2003 Location: High Wycombe, England
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
What in the fucking hell?
In the end it doesn't matter if you are who you say you are. You will still mean nothing to me.
When i have kids, everytime i drive past a fast food restaurant, im gonna punch my kid in the face, then they'll never wanna come..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beware the Ides of March [message #71859] |
Mon, 15 March 2004 18:28 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
That'll teach Caesar for not packing major heat under his Greek bathrobe while he was in the Senate place.
On another note, this should have an "OT:" in front of the title.
Considering how insanely irrelevent and off-topic it is.
Have a nice day.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beware the Ides of March [message #71887] |
Mon, 15 March 2004 20:15 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Let's not start this again...
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|