| Re: Generals 2 [message #461234 is a reply to message #460719] |
Fri, 30 December 2011 12:17   |
kamuixmod
Messages: 211
Registered: July 2010
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
well however. Lets hope it wont be like BF3, which u can throw completely into the shredder because Origin is included.
But its sadly most likely, they will force Origin inside the Game...
|
|
|
|
| Re: Generals 2 [message #461284 is a reply to message #460969] |
Mon, 02 January 2012 00:47 |
 |
Dave Anderson
Messages: 1953
Registered: December 2004
Location: United States
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| liquidv2 wrote on Sat, 17 December 2011 23:32 |
it's using a different engine than Generals so it remains to be seen
and in my defense we detailed the Garbage General long before Salvage was even made
those thieves
|
Generals 2 is being developed on the Frostbite 2 engine that was developed by DICE for Battlefield 3. It should be a very smooth experience as long as they can develop using the engine API's correctly. The engine itself is very polished and well made.
David Anderson
Founder, Software Consultant
DCOM Productions
Microsoft Partner (MSP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Generals 2 [message #461323 is a reply to message #460820] |
Thu, 05 January 2012 02:51 |
bisen11
Messages: 797
Registered: December 2004
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 12 December 2011 23:30 |
| PermaGrin wrote on Mon, 12 December 2011 16:27 |
| R315r4z0r wrote on Sat, 10 December 2011 22:06 |
But it's Bioware, a company who specializes in story.
|
Take Command & Conquer: Generals 2, for example. EA says it's a "BioWare" game, but really, it's being developed by the same studio responsible for the last few Command & Conquer games. Those games didn't do that well, especially the woeful Command & Conquer 4, so in changing the name on the door to read "BioWare" instead of "EA", the publisher is obviously hoping to trade off a little of the goodwill associated with the former while distancing themselves from the reputation of the latter.
http://kotaku.com/5867121/what-does-bioware-even-mean-any-more-it-doesnt-mean-co mmand--conquer
|
Bioware, the actual company, has stated MANY times that their primary focus in making games is to deliver memorable stories with many moral and emotional twists in them. They have said this over and over... and they have already said that is what they hope to accomplish with Generals 2.
Even if this group of people isn't necessarily "Bioware," they are still carrying the company's name. It is not a smart business decision to use the name just to promote sales of one game. You want to sell a lot of MANY games, not just a lot of ONE game.
By using the name Bioware, EA obviously wants to cash in. However, if they don't deliver on Bioware's traditional promise to bring a good story to the game, then they will lose support for their future titles.
Granted THIS game would sell regardless of story simply due the the fact that the name Bioware is attached. But if they don't deliver a good story, what do you think fans will expect for the next game created by the company?
|
We'll finally get to learn how the Generals universe turns into the Tiberium universe 
|
|
|
|
| Re: Generals 2 [message #461343 is a reply to message #461322] |
Thu, 05 January 2012 15:15 |
 |
GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Omar007 wrote on Thu, 05 January 2012 01:34 |
B^U
|
like all bum tickley comics, this would have been better if two of the panels were cut out (namely, the first two)
it's fucking true, though
Toggle Spoiler| Scrin wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22 |
| cAmpa wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 12:45 |
Scrin, stop pming people to get the building bars.
|
FUCK YOU AND THIS SHIT GAME WITH YOUR SCRIPTS!!! I HAVE ASKING YOU AND ANOTHER NOOBS HERE ABOUT HELP WITH THAT BUILDING ICONS FEATURES FOR YEARS, BUT YOU KEEP IGNORING ME AND KEEP WRITE SHIT, SO BURN YOU AND YOUR ASSLICKERS FRIENDS, THIS TIME I'M NOT COME BACK!!!!!!!!!   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
) 4 Votes
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
