Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Heated Discussions and Debates

Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » locking policy

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: locking policy [message #455663 is a reply to message #455355]

Thu, 22 September 2011 15:18

liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007

Karma:

General (3 Stars)

i'll summarize the entire topic using 3 quotes

nikki6ixx wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 18:59

And there are tons of threads about certain individuals, and communities, that did involve a lot of lies and false accusations, yet they were not locked.

danpaul88 wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 03:35

Based on the forum rules I would speculate that the thread in question broke the following rule;

Quote:

Harassment/Racism/Flaming: Harassment of other members, racism, or any hate speech in general will not be tolerated. Moderators will be the judge of what is intolerable, and what is not. Also, please refrain from flaming other members. If you really must, keep it inside of the Hot Issues forum.

MUDKIPS wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 15:48

those threads dont involve friends of crimson

which brings us to

grant89uk wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 12:18

But mudkips point remains the same. You cant lock a post for breaking the rules because it goes against your personal agenda then allow other rule breakers to continue breaking the rules purely because it doesnt concern you.

uh, yes you can? she owns the place
you act as if she has to follow rules or some shit, she can literally do whatever the fuck she wants
if it were Jelly or Wilo being bashed and not one of her n00bstories staff members she values the topic may not have come to her attention at all

nikki6ixx wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 13:32

Quote:

Above all, I demand, yes DEMAND, that the people who we select to be moderators (actually we call them "n00b kickers") be treated with respect that they richly deserve. They sacrifice a bit of their own game time and fun to help keep things running smoothly and I will NOT tolerate them being treated like crap by the likes of you. Period.

That's a rule that should only pertain to the NS forums. Not here. Defamation is one thing, but actually bringing up a viewpoint, backed with evidence, and supported by a large group of people, is another.

Quote:

she can run this place however she wants, choosing to follow rules at her own discretion
it doesn't have to be fair; she owns the place
don't try to hold her to the forum rules when she's king of the forums

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/forkintheroad/burger-king-king.jpg

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Tue, 20 September 2011 13:55
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Tue, 20 September 2011 14:03
		Re: locking policy By: Sean on Wed, 21 September 2011 06:46
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Wed, 21 September 2011 07:21
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Wed, 21 September 2011 07:26
		Re: locking policy By: Sean on Wed, 21 September 2011 13:09
		Re: locking policy By: R315r4z0r on Wed, 21 September 2011 13:16
		Re: locking policy By: Sean on Wed, 21 September 2011 13:28
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Wed, 21 September 2011 13:48
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Wed, 21 September 2011 13:39
		Re: locking policy By: R315r4z0r on Wed, 21 September 2011 09:51
		Re: locking policy By: grant89uk on Wed, 21 September 2011 10:42
		Re: locking policy By: iRANian on Wed, 21 September 2011 13:42
		Re: locking policy By: nikki6ixx on Wed, 21 September 2011 16:59
		Re: locking policy By: nikki6ixx on Thu, 22 September 2011 11:32
		Re: locking policy By: danpaul88 on Thu, 22 September 2011 01:35
		Re: locking policy By: Sean on Thu, 22 September 2011 08:58
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Thu, 22 September 2011 10:44
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Thu, 22 September 2011 10:45
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Thu, 22 September 2011 02:05
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Fri, 07 October 2011 20:30
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Thu, 22 September 2011 07:17
		Re: locking policy By: Gohax on Thu, 22 September 2011 07:26
		Re: locking policy By: iRANian on Thu, 22 September 2011 08:52
		Re: locking policy By: grant89uk on Thu, 22 September 2011 10:18
		Re: locking policy By: Sean on Thu, 22 September 2011 10:55
		Re: locking policy By: Goztow on Thu, 22 September 2011 12:35
		Re: locking policy By: liquidv2 on Thu, 22 September 2011 15:18
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Thu, 22 September 2011 16:15
		Re: locking policy By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 22 September 2011 16:22
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Thu, 22 September 2011 16:26
		Re: locking policy By: liquidv2 on Thu, 22 September 2011 17:54
		Re: locking policy By: iRANian on Fri, 23 September 2011 03:35
		Re: locking policy By: Jerad2142 on Fri, 07 October 2011 15:01
		Re: locking policy By: ehhh on Fri, 07 October 2011 15:06
		Re: locking policy By: Jerad2142 on Fri, 07 October 2011 15:09
		Re: locking policy By: shaitan on Thu, 22 September 2011 21:05
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 23 September 2011 00:35
		Re: locking policy By: C C_guy on Fri, 07 October 2011 17:20
		Re: locking policy By: Aircraftkiller on Fri, 07 October 2011 19:27
		Re: locking policy By: liquidv2 on Fri, 07 October 2011 20:31
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Fri, 07 October 2011 20:37
		Re: locking policy By: Sean on Sat, 08 October 2011 06:32
		Re: locking policy By: Goztow on Sun, 09 October 2011 11:36
		Re: locking policy By: R315r4z0r on Sun, 09 October 2011 15:35
		Re: locking policy By: nikki6ixx on Sun, 09 October 2011 20:31
		Re: locking policy By: Goztow on Mon, 10 October 2011 03:31
		Re: locking policy By: Tunaman on Tue, 11 October 2011 22:34
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Mon, 10 October 2011 19:37
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Tue, 11 October 2011 07:00
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Tue, 11 October 2011 16:39
		Re: locking policy By: TankClash on Tue, 11 October 2011 16:53
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Tue, 11 October 2011 17:20
		Re: locking policy By: TankClash on Tue, 11 October 2011 17:31
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Tue, 11 October 2011 20:46
		Re: locking policy By: shaitan on Wed, 12 October 2011 12:39
		Re: locking policy By: liquidv2 on Wed, 12 October 2011 21:33
		Re: locking policy By: liquidv2 on Tue, 11 October 2011 17:36
		Re: locking policy By: raven on Wed, 12 October 2011 22:01
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Tue, 11 October 2011 21:17
		Re: locking policy By: Aircraftkiller on Tue, 11 October 2011 21:18
		Re: locking policy By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 11 October 2011 22:27
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Tue, 11 October 2011 23:28
		Re: locking policy By: Goztow on Wed, 12 October 2011 00:05
		Re: locking policy By: Spoony on Wed, 12 October 2011 06:28
		Re: locking policy By: grant89uk on Wed, 12 October 2011 11:17
		Re: locking policy By: MUDKIPS on Fri, 14 October 2011 02:24
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Wed, 12 October 2011 06:44
		Re: locking policy By: R315r4z0r on Wed, 12 October 2011 17:56
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Thu, 13 October 2011 03:17
		Re: locking policy By: Wilo on Thu, 13 October 2011 04:34
		Re: locking policy By: danpaul88 on Thu, 13 October 2011 05:36
		Re: locking policy By: ehhh on Thu, 13 October 2011 06:05
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Thu, 13 October 2011 17:11
		Re: locking policy By: Wilo on Thu, 13 October 2011 06:34
		Re: locking policy By: ehhh on Thu, 13 October 2011 07:27
		Re: locking policy By: shaitan on Thu, 13 October 2011 08:21
		Re: locking policy By: Tiesto on Thu, 13 October 2011 11:22
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Thu, 13 October 2011 17:27
		Re: locking policy By: nikki6ixx on Thu, 13 October 2011 17:30
		Re: locking policy By: ChewML on Thu, 13 October 2011 18:26
		Re: locking policy By: Crimson on Thu, 13 October 2011 21:13
		Re: locking policy By: R315r4z0r on Thu, 13 October 2011 19:18

Previous Topic:	Nerdrage
Next Topic:	Atomix

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Sep 27 19:21:03 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01706 seconds