Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » RSF Raptor
|
|
 Re: RSF Raptor [message #429673 is a reply to message #429667] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 09:17   |
DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Goztow wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 08:02 |
I strongly disagree. If this were the case, then they'd have done an EVA message for each building and have a counter per building. Now there's only one EVA message per x time over ALL buildings.
|
Maybe maybe not... with a counter for every building you would still have the problem with multiple short messages after each other.
| Goztow wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 08:02 |
Also BB is a much greater advantage than mine count because it warns you for immediate and urgent danger whereas the mine counter only tells you "there may be danger inside your base within > 30 seconds".
|
Don't forget I'm talking about the feature in general (if every would have it).
Okay maybe it has a negative effect if add bb permanently or not. I'm not sure. It is still nothing is proven for me. I think we have a too different opinions and views about this.
Independent from this. What about my two compromises?
[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:34] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429688 is a reply to message #429685] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 11:03 |
DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Starbuzzz wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 12:54 |
Asking TT for a compromise is like asking the central government to needlessly interefere and help out while the individual states/districts already have the ability to resolve the matter themselves.
|
I'm not asking TT to do anything. Where did you read that?
I'm just discussing and doing mind experiments.
Anyway it's the fault of the building bars if people don't use existing feature. My compromises would change nothing except you can run/walk/shoot while pressing the existing building bar button.
| Quote: |
Thank God someone read my posts!
|
They were full of statements and contained not one example situation to underline them. Starbuzzz finally made that.
[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 11:10] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429691 is a reply to message #429252] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 11:33 |
Tiesto
Messages: 600
Registered: June 2006
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?
You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.
Exodus Senior Moderator
For a commwar against Exodus, pm me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429698 is a reply to message #429697] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 12:05 |
DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
Yet another proof you didn't read my posts.
|
I strongly disagree.
Maybe I understand something different than you when I swrote "example"? Ever thought of that? According to my definition there are no examples or situations which underline your statements.
Btw do you want to continue making baseless suppositions concerning my person? Or do you even want to start insulting me? I'm open for everything today - I already know enough, so there is no need but I'm also happy about every additional piece I can get. It's up to you Gozy 
(@Others: Don't laugh about this here - this is scientific nerdrage on another level you would never think of! Just let me do - I'm just curious)
[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 12:11] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429701 is a reply to message #429699] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 12:43 |
DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Hey you are right. I haven't read that. I only read the lower part of page 4 (everything after my post) and page 5 of this topic. Everything concerning our discussion. How hell should I know that you posted an example long before? I don't have time to follow everything. Give me a hint or a link next time whenever I should ask for something again!
And what are we doing now with the existing building bars? Who's using the existing BBs constantly and often? If not for what are they else useful for? I never really used them in clanwars/public games. Only once in two dozen games just to check if they still appear if I press K. Why are they there?
Edit: Again what's now with my ideas/compromises concerning this?
[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 12:49] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429708 is a reply to message #429704] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 14:24 |
Tiesto
Messages: 600
Registered: June 2006
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23 |
| Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33 |
So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?
You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.
|
Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.
Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.
|
oh my god! Mr angry!
Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?
Exodus Senior Moderator
For a commwar against Exodus, pm me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429724 is a reply to message #429708] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 17:32 |
 |
EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 23:24 |
| EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23 |
| Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33 |
So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?
You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.
|
Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.
Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.
|
oh my god! Mr angry!
Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?
|
Not until you show me that majority. My guess is that it'll be pretty 50/50 when you'll look at all servers. But I haven't checked this.
And I'm being Mr.Angry because I hate it when someone claims sonething which may very well be different. The majority could be true, but you're stating it as if it where a fact, that's plain wrong.
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/
| V, V for Vendetta |
People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429728 is a reply to message #429724] |
Sat, 29 May 2010 18:06 |
 |
Clark Kent
Messages: 274
Registered: January 2010
Location: Smallville, Kansas
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 19:32 |
| Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 23:24 |
| EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23 |
| Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33 |
So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?
You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.
|
Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.
Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.
|
oh my god! Mr angry!
Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?
|
Not until you show me that majority. My guess is that it'll be pretty 50/50 when you'll look at all servers. But I haven't checked this.
And I'm being Mr.Angry because I hate it when someone claims sonething which may very well be different. The majority could be true, but you're stating it as if it where a fact, that's plain wrong.
|
Should have said "active" servers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RSF Raptor [message #429745 is a reply to message #429728] |
Sun, 30 May 2010 00:24 |
|
EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Clark Kent wrote on Sun, 30 May 2010 03:06 |
| EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 19:32 |
| Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 23:24 |
| EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23 |
| Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33 |
So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?
You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.
|
Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.
Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.
|
oh my god! Mr angry!
Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?
|
Not until you show me that majority. My guess is that it'll be pretty 50/50 when you'll look at all servers. But I haven't checked this.
And I'm being Mr.Angry because I hate it when someone claims sonething which may very well be different. The majority could be true, but you're stating it as if it where a fact, that's plain wrong.
|
Should have said "active" servers.
|
BlackIntel is active. Not as active as it has been in the past, but hey, what server doesn't suffer?
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/
| V, V for Vendetta |
People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Mar 03 02:31:12 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02074 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
