Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » What should C&C3 have been?
Re: What should C&C3 have been? [message #420583 is a reply to message #420576] |
Mon, 22 February 2010 16:48 |
|
GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605 Registered: March 2006
Karma:
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Agreed with pretty much everything ya said there, but lemme pick out a small little bit here.
[NE | Fobby[GEN] wrote on Mon, 22 February 2010 17:35]
-No Scrin: Personally, I think the whole "aliens invading the earth" thing has been way overdone. Westwood originally wanted CABAL as the third faction; this could've been a lot more interesting.
|
While CABAL was definitely intended to be a third faction, the Scrin clearly were meant to have more involvement. HOWEVER, they should have been introduced in an entirely different fashion. Rather than a third, playable faction, they should have been WAY more ominous and foreboding. Something of a plot device that CABAL or Kane would use as a method of bringing about the destruction of the Earth (or, well, terraforming it, whatever).
Personally, I LOVED how the Scrin were in TD (a small, tiny spacecraft), Renegade (an outright crashed UFO being investigated by Nod), and in TS (a remade ship, as well as being more or less hinted at than directly mentioned and appearing). They should have continued along a similar path, possibly with the end being something along the lines of Nod and/or GDI discovering that there are more scout ships patrolling around Earth's atmosphere or something (which would hint at a very imminent invasion).
I really did hate how the Scrin just outright invaded in C&C3, but I still like the idea of them.
Toggle SpoilerScrin wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22 |
cAmpa wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 12:45 | Scrin, stop pming people to get the building bars.
|
FUCK YOU AND THIS SHIT GAME WITH YOUR SCRIPTS!!! I HAVE ASKING YOU AND ANOTHER NOOBS HERE ABOUT HELP WITH THAT BUILDING ICONS FEATURES FOR YEARS, BUT YOU KEEP IGNORING ME AND KEEP WRITE SHIT, SO BURN YOU AND YOUR ASSLICKERS FRIENDS, THIS TIME I'M NOT COME BACK!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: zeratul on Mon, 22 February 2010 16:46
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 06:24
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 17:32
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nope.avi on Mon, 22 February 2010 18:35
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:55
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: DRNG on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:04
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:18
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: DRNG on Tue, 23 February 2010 05:53
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Zion on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:12
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:32
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: HaTe on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:35
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: cmatt42 on Wed, 24 February 2010 22:31
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Tiesto on Wed, 24 February 2010 07:02
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 12:12
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Nov 30 20:17:37 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01058 seconds
|