|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The problem with CarrierII [message #416147 is a reply to message #416008] |
Wed, 30 December 2009 07:25   |
RoCk2Star
Messages: 141
Registered: July 2009
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| archerman wrote on Tue, 29 December 2009 05:01 |
discuss about CarrierII's obsession of splitting topics.
|
Carrier is a good mod,fu plz.
I think we rather should discuss your over sized mom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The problem with CarrierII [message #416161 is a reply to message #416008] |
Wed, 30 December 2009 09:46 |
|
|
rofl. For those of you interested in the story...
Map was Walls_Flying, I was GDI, and Surth was Nod. Due to a silly spat of tit-for-tat building kills, both sides were reduced to a Rax/HON and a Ref, then GDI's Rax got nuked with sniper cover. We still got pretty close to a disarm though.
In the confusion of all the building kills, there was a lot of tank thefts, and when play settled down, GDI had a stolen stank.
I, half jokingly, suggested I could get into Nod's base with the stank and ion something. (The last attempt, involving another player as a hotwire in the stank to C4 the ref failed because I put timed on a sak's butt, which naturally caused her to respawn in the ref and the stank had to run)
I got in, past a player walking in circles for no obvious reason and drove all the way behind the destroyed strip and PP and parked the stank by the ref silo. I got out, and placed the ion.
Surth's post pretty much has the rest, although I did shoot the only engi not blind enough to not notice the ion right behind the ref silo.
ROFL.
Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
| BBC news, quoting... |
Supporters of Proposition 8 will argue California does not discriminate against gays, as the current law allows them to get married - as long as they wed a partner of the opposite sex.
|
| halokid wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 08:46 |
| R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 15:35 |
|
the hell is that?
|
[Updated on: Wed, 30 December 2009 09:47] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: The problem with CarrierII [message #416167 is a reply to message #416161] |
Wed, 30 December 2009 10:38 |
 |
Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| CarrierII wrote on Wed, 30 December 2009 11:46 |
rofl. For those of you interested in the story...
Map was Walls_Flying, I was GDI, and Surth was Nod. Due to a silly spat of tit-for-tat building kills, both sides were reduced to a Rax/HON and a Ref, then GDI's Rax got nuked with sniper cover. We still got pretty close to a disarm though.
In the confusion of all the building kills, there was a lot of tank thefts, and when play settled down, GDI had a stolen stank.
I, half jokingly, suggested I could get into Nod's base with the stank and ion something. (The last attempt, involving another player as a hotwire in the stank to C4 the ref failed because I put timed on a sak's butt, which naturally caused her to respawn in the ref and the stank had to run)
I got in, past a player walking in circles for no obvious reason and drove all the way behind the destroyed strip and PP and parked the stank by the ref silo. I got out, and placed the ion.
Surth's post pretty much has the rest, although I did shoot the only engi not blind enough to not notice the ion right behind the ref silo.
ROFL.
|
AND IT WAS MARATHON. ther horrible boringness 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The problem with CarrierII [message #416216 is a reply to message #416161] |
Wed, 30 December 2009 16:39 |
nopol10
Messages: 1044
Registered: February 2005
Location: Singapore
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| CarrierII wrote on Thu, 31 December 2009 00:46 |
rofl. For those of you interested in the story...
Map was Walls_Flying, I was GDI, and Surth was Nod. Due to a silly spat of tit-for-tat building kills, both sides were reduced to a Rax/HON and a Ref, then GDI's Rax got nuked with sniper cover. We still got pretty close to a disarm though.
In the confusion of all the building kills, there was a lot of tank thefts, and when play settled down, GDI had a stolen stank.
I, half jokingly, suggested I could get into Nod's base with the stank and ion something. (The last attempt, involving another player as a hotwire in the stank to C4 the ref failed because I put timed on a sak's butt, which naturally caused her to respawn in the ref and the stank had to run)
I got in, past a player walking in circles for no obvious reason and drove all the way behind the destroyed strip and PP and parked the stank by the ref silo. I got out, and placed the ion.
Surth's post pretty much has the rest, although I did shoot the only engi not blind enough to not notice the ion right behind the ref silo.
ROFL.
|
This is completely off-topic and should be split by your good self.
nopol10=Nopol=nopol(GSA)
|
|
|
|
| Re: The problem with CarrierII [message #416279 is a reply to message #416216] |
Thu, 31 December 2009 03:22 |
|
|
| nopol10 wrote on Wed, 30 December 2009 23:39 |
| CarrierII wrote on Thu, 31 December 2009 00:46 |
rofl. For those of you interested in the story...
Map was Walls_Flying, I was GDI, and Surth was Nod. Due to a silly spat of tit-for-tat building kills, both sides were reduced to a Rax/HON and a Ref, then GDI's Rax got nuked with sniper cover. We still got pretty close to a disarm though.
In the confusion of all the building kills, there was a lot of tank thefts, and when play settled down, GDI had a stolen stank.
I, half jokingly, suggested I could get into Nod's base with the stank and ion something. (The last attempt, involving another player as a hotwire in the stank to C4 the ref failed because I put timed on a sak's butt, which naturally caused her to respawn in the ref and the stank had to run)
I got in, past a player walking in circles for no obvious reason and drove all the way behind the destroyed strip and PP and parked the stank by the ref silo. I got out, and placed the ion.
Surth's post pretty much has the rest, although I did shoot the only engi not blind enough to not notice the ion right behind the ref silo.
ROFL.
|
This is completely off-topic and should be split by your good self.
|
Post of the year?
Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
| BBC news, quoting... |
Supporters of Proposition 8 will argue California does not discriminate against gays, as the current law allows them to get married - as long as they wed a partner of the opposite sex.
|
| halokid wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 08:46 |
| R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 15:35 |
|
the hell is that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
