Re: Tournament Feedback [message #415606 is a reply to message #414552] |
Sat, 26 December 2009 14:58 |
|
Goztow
Messages: 9738 Registered: March 2005 Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
|
General (5 Stars) Goztoe |
|
|
It gave u the time to think of that long TT history post...
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Tournament Feedback [message #415866 is a reply to message #415487] |
Mon, 28 December 2009 09:30 |
|
luv2pb
Messages: 1488 Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Not everything is as it appears Untouchable |
|
|
ELiT3FLyR wrote on Fri, 25 December 2009 10:54 | yes guys, good idea, lets make this next tournament as complicated as possible!
|
Better that then the mess the first one was. Also, there is a difference between being complex and being structured.
N00bstories Director Of Operations
|
|
|
|
Re: Tournament Feedback [message #416204 is a reply to message #414552] |
Wed, 30 December 2009 14:04 |
ELiT3FLyR
Messages: 119 Registered: April 2008
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Quote: | Thus the tourney/league standings:
(Rank, Name, Match Count, Total Score, Buildings Killed)
1: SoQ. Matches: 2. Points: 28,600. Buildings killed: 9. // Both by base destruction, therefore highest standing.
2: CW.cc. Matches: 2. Points: 25,900. Buildings killed: 1. // Note that Points is used to sort out who is winning when buildings killed is =.
3: [NE]. Matches: 1. Points: 16,300. Buildings killed: 1.
4: TK2. Matches: 1. Points: 17,300. Buildings killed: 0.
5: Jelly. Matches: 0. Points: 0. Builings killed: 0. // Jelly need to play! lol
6: Etc Etc.
| please tell me how this is better/simpler/easier to do than simply playing a 5 game series and counting the map win/loses?
[Updated on: Wed, 30 December 2009 17:55] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Tournament Feedback [message #416283 is a reply to message #416204] |
Thu, 31 December 2009 03:27 |
|
ELiT3FLyR wrote on Wed, 30 December 2009 21:04 |
Quote: | Thus the tourney/league standings:
(Rank, Name, Match Count, Total Score, Buildings Killed)
1: SoQ. Matches: 2. Points: 28,600. Buildings killed: 9. // Both by base destruction, therefore highest standing.
2: CW.cc. Matches: 2. Points: 25,900. Buildings killed: 1. // Note that Points is used to sort out who is winning when buildings killed is =.
3: [NE]. Matches: 1. Points: 16,300. Buildings killed: 1.
4: TK2. Matches: 1. Points: 17,300. Buildings killed: 0.
5: Jelly. Matches: 0. Points: 0. Builings killed: 0. // Jelly need to play! lol
6: Etc Etc.
| please tell me how this is better/simpler/easier to do than simply playing a 5 game series and counting the map win/loses?
|
me |
I was going to ask Hex about automating the scoring...
|
me, AGAIN |
I was going to look into automating the scoring...
|
Still don't get it?
Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
BBC news, quoting... |
Supporters of Proposition 8 will argue California does not discriminate against gays, as the current law allows them to get married - as long as they wed a partner of the opposite sex.
|
halokid wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 08:46 |
R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 15:35 |
|
the hell is that?
|
[Updated on: Thu, 31 December 2009 03:28] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Tournament Feedback [message #416294 is a reply to message #414552] |
Thu, 31 December 2009 06:10 |
ELiT3FLyR
Messages: 119 Registered: April 2008
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
whatever idc, but take some advice, the more complicated a tourney gets the less likely it is to work and the less fun it is for everybody else. if u want to count building kills rather than actuall wins as ur scoring system then be my guest, somehwere along the line someones going to be like wtf, we won 4 and lost one by basekill, and yet these guys have won 2 and lost 3 and are still higher than us?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Tournament Feedback [message #427266 is a reply to message #421163] |
Fri, 30 April 2010 21:27 |
Majid123
Messages: 8 Registered: April 2010 Location: Florida
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Good-One-Driver wrote on Sun, 28 February 2010 23:37 | It was good for a first try...
Second (if there is one) hopefully will be more organized and planned better
|
kinda late, u need an update!
|
|
|
|