|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #406855 is a reply to message #406841] |
Wed, 14 October 2009 10:10   |
 |
ArtyWh0re
Messages: 665
Registered: June 2008
Location: Hand of Nod
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
For me overall it is the LCG but I like both at different times.
I least prefer to fight agaisnt a Gunner with infantry as they can hs you pretty quickly with super fast rockets and thier range is very long as well.
The LCG does not have projectiles so does not need to travel in order to hit its target. Meaning it is hard to miss with it.
But if I was facing a n00bjet I would prefer to be Gunner.
Check out my C&C Renegade videos!
http://www.youtube.com/user/Shodan234
[Updated on: Wed, 14 October 2009 10:13] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #406857 is a reply to message #406841] |
Wed, 14 October 2009 10:46 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Gunner is usually the better character because the rocket launcher is usually the better weapon; it lets you snap-fire from behind cover without giving up most of your damage output. LCG does have an advantage against aircraft though, on account of its being impossible to miss with.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #406984 is a reply to message #406841] |
Thu, 15 October 2009 13:59 |
Hitman
Messages: 878
Registered: November 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
|
patches can fuck any infantry up from close, about as deadly as a mobius... but it doesn't really have much use in a game as far as im concerned
|
|
|
|
| Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #407029 is a reply to message #406841] |
Thu, 15 October 2009 22:05 |
|
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Patches can fuck up infantry from a lot farther away than Mobius can. Flechette is a mean little piece of work, it's just totally worthless against vehicles- which isn't true of LCG, Gunner, or even the SBH. If you're fighting mostly infantry, you'd be better off picking Patch over Gunner, but the big black Brit is a much better general purpose choice.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #407054 is a reply to message #406841] |
Fri, 16 October 2009 01:03 |
RoCk2Star
Messages: 141
Registered: July 2009
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Well in my opinion gunner is better at closer battles due to the splash and rof while at longer range you can dodge rocket. Lcg wins at long range battles due to dps and accuracy.
But i'd prefer gunner cause its more use full in most situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #421790 is a reply to message #421417] |
Tue, 09 March 2010 18:18 |
Poobuh
Messages: 6
Registered: March 2010
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| liquidv2 wrote on Wed, 03 March 2010 20:02 |
true, but you cannot headshot a tank
|
True but gunner isn't as accurate and that doesn't mean LCGs rapid fire won't do anything against tanks
|
|
|
|
| Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #422229 is a reply to message #421417] |
Sat, 13 March 2010 17:39 |
anant
Messages: 571
Registered: July 2008
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| liquidv2 wrote on Wed, 03 March 2010 20:02 |
true, but you cannot headshot a tank
|
Its been done
/sarcasm
Rest in peace spoonplex, We love you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
